ALL THINGS SOCIAL--GOOD TO
GO FOR BEHAVIORAL GENETICS
BY READING FURTHER YOU AGREE THAT YOU
HAVE READ AND AGREE TO ALL DISCLAIMERS
AND HEREBY INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
(alternate link in case of link "breakage;"
(you are agreeing seen / read / accepted))
6/1/2013
URL for this location
or
http://goo.gl/HbwTQ
Bluntly, this is a pro-traditional morality site as of recent months,
and actually in a fervent manner.
I happen to be convinced that Thomas Jefferson likely subscribed
to the basic construct of this theory, inasmuch as he, believe it
or not, believed on "aliens" and reconciled our historic and moral
underpinnings with that, as I surmise.
http://goo.gl/oW9WR
The person I regard as the inspiration, if not the actual author, of
Oz, Joslyn Matilda Gage, obviously embedded "witchhunt," in
truth, in her idea "Wicked Witch of the West."
This website and theory exists in the same vein.
I think we're living in a conveyed (fully two-pronged scientifically
experimental) proving in morality, history and science.
This page, however, is where I'm going to consolidate the
"rough stuff" (yes I know some is scattered on other pages
still.) If you are disinterested in the pursuit of
aims that are incongruent with freedom, equality and love,
this page could be needlessly distracting from the happiness you
must possess, as it's content and non-judgmental people who
care about others.
Everyone forewarned, here it comes.
But it's followed with "Ruined," "The Help," "West Side Story,"
and more.
The masculine insecure paranoid clown is a
likely gay gene carrier cause the witch-hunt
community in-breeds the gay gene.
A witch-hunting community's arbitrary perversions
will correlate with the gay gene because the
traits are favored by the witch-hunt community,
which in-breeds the gay gene.
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(--fair use--academic--bare bone essentials--)
(undoubtedly the gene source is clueless, often
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality )
DISCLAIMER:
NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONE
IDENTIFIED/IDENTIFIABLE OR OF ANY OF THEIR
RELATION(S.)
OPINION. SUPPOSITION. THEORY.
ALSO REFLECTS OPINION, SUPPOSITION, THEORY AS
TO EVENTS OR ACTIONS REGARDING OR CAUSED BY
SAID EXPRESS OR IMAGINABLE PERSONS OR THEIR
RELATIONS
Switch capitalism and democracy out with monopoly fascism and get
someone to call someone gay who disagrees.
Here’s one link.
http://www.pittsburghcitypaper.ws/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A24527
Here’s another link.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/vote-2010-election-emasculation-politics-sharron-angle-tells/story?id=11891642
Here’s yet another link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/14/jane-norton-ad-youd-think_n_646061.html
That man-hating mother had been the presumed basis of
male homsexuality is not actually inconsistent with the
gay gene passing maternally
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
and in fact is consistent with
the Peter Pan Syndrome, which may in fact have
involved both emotional and genetic aspects, one might
consider anew..
Developmental occurrence is established.
It’s yet to be universally seen plainly as day:
after a few babes, a few more for other
group application (the Spartan Army was a
gay army, it’s been essentially established.)
Again subject to the disclaimers above, the
guy transfering witchhunt insultingly,
offensively and threateningly will, though
midwives were the target of medieval doctors’
witchhunts, and though the gay gene passes
maternally, evidence implies, is transferring
the very limitations that enabled earlier men
empowered by witchhunt to have the women of
those who would so transfer witchhunt.
For the person enjoying the power to judge
to scapegoat, mollify or self adulate at someone
else’s expense, be it someone who had it in
for, say, Dale Akiki (my opinion, including as to the
possiblity of shrew,) this morality of witchhunt
enables the “Witchunt of One,” a reality of modern
life to which every reader should soon recognize.
The person transferring witchhung who's voluntarily obese
as a result of the arbitrary perversions associated with
the fear of being demonized will be both emotionally and
physically inadequate, as the former causes impotence
and the latter is associated with parents given to
transference of paranoia and self assuring instead of
love, recognition, and the sense of fulfillment that comes
from caring about people other than oneself.
There’s not the slightest thing wrong
with machismo. There is with paranoia.
The Greeks coined paranoia (“all knowing”)
and logos (living word.) The former explains
the road to understanding lost sight of, and
their understanding of the latter may have been
more advanced withing the framework of
Gilgamesh, Nostradamus, Pascal, Newton,
Shakespeare and quantum mechanics that
heretofore appreciated, to be sure.
Based on a sample of 73 red's gone from
fag to macho. Earlier it was eating soy
made men's breasts larger even though
Asian men have eaten it all along w/o
growing larger breasts; and, they've more
babies (literally--there's actually far less
homosexuality in the East.)
The trait favored by the witchhunt bound
community will be favored and thus correlated
with the gay gene that is forced underground.
Again subject to the disclaimers above, and adding,
any intimation(s) imaginable based on the following
pairings necessarily reflect nothing more than
opinion/supposition/theory.
The pop “psych” personality’s been typically followed,
in the past, on syndicated radio, by the “dark” figure
connected with the Watergate break-in.
I don’t know if this was photoshopped.
http://momocrats.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ee37895883301156fbb907a970c-800wi
Nixon-Rebozo?
http://static2.volkskrant.nl/static/photo/2011/13/16/2/20111229071831/media_l_1057382.jpg
J. Edgar
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bsdSv6uXvfo/Th1jzzkf3OI/AAAAAAAABe8/_kjvhItb7lQ/s1600/hoover.tolson.jpg
Virtually all murderers of gays have proven being gay.
Virtually all leaders of the religious right who
engage in gay bashing ultimately have proved
or prove either being gay or have had, or have,
a kid come, or coming, out.
Many straight people mistaken for gay have been
brutally attacked where the assailants have
proven being gay.
History's control freaks have been gay.
Hitler famously feminine. JFK's killers gay fascists.
The kid bringing a gun onto a Texas
campus will be pre-filtered paranoid,
and thus his campus will be one with
gun-toting paranoids, because after
a decade of gay leaders transferring the
fear of being demonized as gay the
person clownishly dependent on phallic
symbols will be acting out of paranoia.
He will simultaneously bring the
paranoid mindset. The persons presuming
being all knowing will be the annoying,
presumptuous, imposing, threatening
judger. And he'll be packing a gun.
He'll be unemployable in my book for any
organization dealing with the public, but he'll be
perfect for a police captain needing a paranoid
control freak.
There’s not the slightest thing wrong
with machismo. There is with paranoia.
This theory says, just as in the manner of
Gray's Sports Almanac from "Back to the Future," that
the failure to not judge was a guided implanted gradient,
while the Lost Tribe established a second history-science-
morality based prong in a conveyed proving that
those three things are one and the same.
Its endpoint is our understanding that proofs of relation
and original information, and that as best approximately
understood linguistically, freedom, equality and love are
living informations, are awaiting our demonstration
of this understanding.
Jefferson also re-wrote the Christian Bible without
pretense for judging.
This proving should also provide the means to travel to the stars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6i5vgDJFb4
Note, at the beginning of the above passage, I say
I've been more traditionally religious for the past few
months.
But, in hindsight, I'm curious about the nature of an
experience the night before Easter 3 Easters
ago, when I thought my Dad stared me in my eyes,
in my sleep.
There was a stretch of ideas that fed this process until
a point coincident with events that for a demonstrable
fact culminated in my Mom's no longer being suitable
for hospice care, though, I did in fact lose her more recently.
The passage above's study of family is consistent with
the open mysogny of the religious right leadership,
the honor killings committed by Muslim men,
the well known fondness of dominatrix based affairs
among many males in top American government,
especially in Nevadan locations.
Max Keiser recently reported on a similar reality
as to some of the London group of banksters.
Of course, the foremost power center is where
billionaires perform plays int he woods in
women's clothes, but with no women permitted.
Atrocities suffered by Americans at the hands of
some of their police, and they've been known to
have had issues related to mysogny, are essentially
Abu Ghraib suffered at home.
It's been recently purported that two power centers
have attempted seizing power in the U.S.:
a tradiltionally fascist one, centered toward the
West coast, and one based on zealotry from within
some element of the particularly Zionist community,
mainly centered on the U.S. East coast, as so purported.
I've conceptualized dysfunctional half brothers as
one way of looking at the Middle Eastern conflict,
with the Biblical conceptualization of Isaac
(faithful test of fire by Abraham, now a particularly
interesting allegory) and Ishmael.
So in the U.S. our suddenly evident crop of oppressors
unify the elements within Isaac and Ishmael that our
theorized teachers of a lesson in science, morality and
history disdain, and which, by way of what was most likely
their direct instruction to us, namely the Epic of Gilgamesh,
constitute a means of ingratiating oneself, informationally,
to bad information, whereas love and good deeds
imprint in good information.
For convenience of presentation I've assigned
scapegoating and ego defense (arrogance)
roles, essentially consistent with judging to
control and enlsave having an emotional
counterpart in transference to scapegoat for
power, for mollification ("pacification,") and as
to the natural concomitant reaction, ego defense
(arrogance.)
But as best understood by way of "The Help," the
failings wrought by witchhunt also DIRECTLY
induce arrogance, which helps explain why
business leaders of all stripes can so easily fall
in league with standard masters of fear and hate
for control.
Ghandi broke control in the manner of any
sensible being. When I walk my dog and she
gets tired, she just sits down, and then she's
my master. Ghandi would not harm his oppressor.
Partly it was that doing so would provide
justification for a heavy handed crackdown,
while losing heart would have also been a pathway
to failure. He won because he simply sat down.
Except he also refused to harm his oppressors
because, he actually said, they simply suffered from the
same insecurities from which we all suffer.
He turned the other cheek (moral.)
He refused taking it personally (psychiatric.)
He unified all major religion in his act.
URL for this location
or
http://goo.gl/HbwTQ
Bluntly, this is a pro-traditional morality site as of recent months,
and actually in a fervent manner.
I happen to be convinced that Thomas Jefferson likely subscribed
to the basic construct of this theory, inasmuch as he, believe it
or not, believed on "aliens" and reconciled our historic and moral
underpinnings with that, as I surmise.
http://goo.gl/oW9WR
The person I regard as the inspiration, if not the actual author, of
Oz, Joslyn Matilda Gage, obviously embedded "witchhunt," in
truth, in her idea "Wicked Witch of the West."
This website and theory exists in the same vein.
I think we're living in a conveyed (fully two-pronged scientifically
experimental) proving in morality, history and science.
This page, however, is where I'm going to consolidate the
"rough stuff" (yes I know some is scattered on other pages
still.) If you are disinterested in the pursuit of
aims that are incongruent with freedom, equality and love,
this page could be needlessly distracting from the happiness you
must possess, as it's content and non-judgmental people who
care about others.
Everyone forewarned, here it comes.
But it's followed with "Ruined," "The Help," "West Side Story,"
and more.
The masculine insecure paranoid clown is a
likely gay gene carrier cause the witch-hunt
community in-breeds the gay gene.
A witch-hunting community's arbitrary perversions
will correlate with the gay gene because the
traits are favored by the witch-hunt community,
which in-breeds the gay gene.
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(--fair use--academic--bare bone essentials--)
(undoubtedly the gene source is clueless, often
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality )
DISCLAIMER:
NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONE
IDENTIFIED/IDENTIFIABLE OR OF ANY OF THEIR
RELATION(S.)
OPINION. SUPPOSITION. THEORY.
ALSO REFLECTS OPINION, SUPPOSITION, THEORY AS
TO EVENTS OR ACTIONS REGARDING OR CAUSED BY
SAID EXPRESS OR IMAGINABLE PERSONS OR THEIR
RELATIONS
Switch capitalism and democracy out with monopoly fascism and get
someone to call someone gay who disagrees.
Here’s one link.
http://www.pittsburghcitypaper.ws/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A24527
Here’s another link.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/vote-2010-election-emasculation-politics-sharron-angle-tells/story?id=11891642
Here’s yet another link.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/14/jane-norton-ad-youd-think_n_646061.html
That man-hating mother had been the presumed basis of
male homsexuality is not actually inconsistent with the
gay gene passing maternally
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
and in fact is consistent with
the Peter Pan Syndrome, which may in fact have
involved both emotional and genetic aspects, one might
consider anew..
Developmental occurrence is established.
It’s yet to be universally seen plainly as day:
after a few babes, a few more for other
group application (the Spartan Army was a
gay army, it’s been essentially established.)
Again subject to the disclaimers above, the
guy transfering witchhunt insultingly,
offensively and threateningly will, though
midwives were the target of medieval doctors’
witchhunts, and though the gay gene passes
maternally, evidence implies, is transferring
the very limitations that enabled earlier men
empowered by witchhunt to have the women of
those who would so transfer witchhunt.
For the person enjoying the power to judge
to scapegoat, mollify or self adulate at someone
else’s expense, be it someone who had it in
for, say, Dale Akiki (my opinion, including as to the
possiblity of shrew,) this morality of witchhunt
enables the “Witchunt of One,” a reality of modern
life to which every reader should soon recognize.
The person transferring witchhung who's voluntarily obese
as a result of the arbitrary perversions associated with
the fear of being demonized will be both emotionally and
physically inadequate, as the former causes impotence
and the latter is associated with parents given to
transference of paranoia and self assuring instead of
love, recognition, and the sense of fulfillment that comes
from caring about people other than oneself.
There’s not the slightest thing wrong
with machismo. There is with paranoia.
The Greeks coined paranoia (“all knowing”)
and logos (living word.) The former explains
the road to understanding lost sight of, and
their understanding of the latter may have been
more advanced withing the framework of
Gilgamesh, Nostradamus, Pascal, Newton,
Shakespeare and quantum mechanics that
heretofore appreciated, to be sure.
Based on a sample of 73 red's gone from
fag to macho. Earlier it was eating soy
made men's breasts larger even though
Asian men have eaten it all along w/o
growing larger breasts; and, they've more
babies (literally--there's actually far less
homosexuality in the East.)
The trait favored by the witchhunt bound
community will be favored and thus correlated
with the gay gene that is forced underground.
Again subject to the disclaimers above, and adding,
any intimation(s) imaginable based on the following
pairings necessarily reflect nothing more than
opinion/supposition/theory.
The pop “psych” personality’s been typically followed,
in the past, on syndicated radio, by the “dark” figure
connected with the Watergate break-in.
I don’t know if this was photoshopped.
http://momocrats.typepad.com/.a/6a00e54ee37895883301156fbb907a970c-800wi
Nixon-Rebozo?
http://static2.volkskrant.nl/static/photo/2011/13/16/2/20111229071831/media_l_1057382.jpg
J. Edgar
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-bsdSv6uXvfo/Th1jzzkf3OI/AAAAAAAABe8/_kjvhItb7lQ/s1600/hoover.tolson.jpg
Virtually all murderers of gays have proven being gay.
Virtually all leaders of the religious right who
engage in gay bashing ultimately have proved
or prove either being gay or have had, or have,
a kid come, or coming, out.
Many straight people mistaken for gay have been
brutally attacked where the assailants have
proven being gay.
History's control freaks have been gay.
Hitler famously feminine. JFK's killers gay fascists.
The kid bringing a gun onto a Texas
campus will be pre-filtered paranoid,
and thus his campus will be one with
gun-toting paranoids, because after
a decade of gay leaders transferring the
fear of being demonized as gay the
person clownishly dependent on phallic
symbols will be acting out of paranoia.
He will simultaneously bring the
paranoid mindset. The persons presuming
being all knowing will be the annoying,
presumptuous, imposing, threatening
judger. And he'll be packing a gun.
He'll be unemployable in my book for any
organization dealing with the public, but he'll be
perfect for a police captain needing a paranoid
control freak.
There’s not the slightest thing wrong
with machismo. There is with paranoia.
This theory says, just as in the manner of
Gray's Sports Almanac from "Back to the Future," that
the failure to not judge was a guided implanted gradient,
while the Lost Tribe established a second history-science-
morality based prong in a conveyed proving that
those three things are one and the same.
Its endpoint is our understanding that proofs of relation
and original information, and that as best approximately
understood linguistically, freedom, equality and love are
living informations, are awaiting our demonstration
of this understanding.
Jefferson also re-wrote the Christian Bible without
pretense for judging.
This proving should also provide the means to travel to the stars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6i5vgDJFb4
Note, at the beginning of the above passage, I say
I've been more traditionally religious for the past few
months.
But, in hindsight, I'm curious about the nature of an
experience the night before Easter 3 Easters
ago, when I thought my Dad stared me in my eyes,
in my sleep.
There was a stretch of ideas that fed this process until
a point coincident with events that for a demonstrable
fact culminated in my Mom's no longer being suitable
for hospice care, though, I did in fact lose her more recently.
The passage above's study of family is consistent with
the open mysogny of the religious right leadership,
the honor killings committed by Muslim men,
the well known fondness of dominatrix based affairs
among many males in top American government,
especially in Nevadan locations.
Max Keiser recently reported on a similar reality
as to some of the London group of banksters.
Of course, the foremost power center is where
billionaires perform plays int he woods in
women's clothes, but with no women permitted.
Atrocities suffered by Americans at the hands of
some of their police, and they've been known to
have had issues related to mysogny, are essentially
Abu Ghraib suffered at home.
It's been recently purported that two power centers
have attempted seizing power in the U.S.:
a tradiltionally fascist one, centered toward the
West coast, and one based on zealotry from within
some element of the particularly Zionist community,
mainly centered on the U.S. East coast, as so purported.
I've conceptualized dysfunctional half brothers as
one way of looking at the Middle Eastern conflict,
with the Biblical conceptualization of Isaac
(faithful test of fire by Abraham, now a particularly
interesting allegory) and Ishmael.
So in the U.S. our suddenly evident crop of oppressors
unify the elements within Isaac and Ishmael that our
theorized teachers of a lesson in science, morality and
history disdain, and which, by way of what was most likely
their direct instruction to us, namely the Epic of Gilgamesh,
constitute a means of ingratiating oneself, informationally,
to bad information, whereas love and good deeds
imprint in good information.
For convenience of presentation I've assigned
scapegoating and ego defense (arrogance)
roles, essentially consistent with judging to
control and enlsave having an emotional
counterpart in transference to scapegoat for
power, for mollification ("pacification,") and as
to the natural concomitant reaction, ego defense
(arrogance.)
But as best understood by way of "The Help," the
failings wrought by witchhunt also DIRECTLY
induce arrogance, which helps explain why
business leaders of all stripes can so easily fall
in league with standard masters of fear and hate
for control.
Ghandi broke control in the manner of any
sensible being. When I walk my dog and she
gets tired, she just sits down, and then she's
my master. Ghandi would not harm his oppressor.
Partly it was that doing so would provide
justification for a heavy handed crackdown,
while losing heart would have also been a pathway
to failure. He won because he simply sat down.
Except he also refused to harm his oppressors
because, he actually said, they simply suffered from the
same insecurities from which we all suffer.
He turned the other cheek (moral.)
He refused taking it personally (psychiatric.)
He unified all major religion in his act.
Where the Henry Makow-types go wrong, I feel, is in
somehow conflating female equality with some nefarious purpose
when what's operative is control alliances.
The license to judge is the license to control and enslave.
The rich demagogue subs monopoly for capitalism (simplifying) and the
mouthpiece demonizes and makes afraid of being demonizing anyone not
liking it.
This has nothing to do with genderism.
This may be one construct connecting witchhunt with "sociobiologic apoptosis,"
on the East page.
PETER PAN SYNDROME
(Boy failed to develop masculine traits
due to intense limitation by mother.)
PREVIOUSLY MAN-HATING MOTHER THE PRESUMPTIVE CAUSE OF MALE HOMOSEXUALITY
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality
GAY GENE ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY (BUT THAT WOULD BE EMINENTLY
CONSISTENT WITH, NOT CONTRADICTORY OF, THE NON-BIOLOGIC PSYCHIATRIC BASIS)
(I say non-biologic not to imply psychiatric disorder, but only to distinguish
biology vs. relationship, as basis. After a few babes, a few more for other purposes,
with, for instance, the Spartan Army recently all but proved to have been a gay army,
all signalling a numerical genetic advantage for the group. After most generations,
prior to history’s being written, optimal occurrence “developmentally,” which occurrence
is essentially a dead-issue proved, would be the natural result. But we know it’s genetic
too by way of the linked proof and the fact of those at the center of witchhunt to judge to
control to enslave having been process self-produced hypocritical gays.
Witchhunt of one, or the scapegoating of convenience, by the person whose morality
is I’m perfect and noone else is, is the Dale Akiki scapegoating incident (opinion.)
It enables allies to enslave.
Witchhunt is the rich demagogue replacing monopoly for capitalism (simplifying) and the
mouthpiece demonizing and making afraid of being demonized whomever does not like it.
UNSELF-AWARE LESBIANS
FAVORED PRODUCTION OF THE GAY GENE THROUGH THAT PROCESS
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality
ALSO FAVOR, THEREBY, MAN-HATERS
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(Simple transitive property of math: If some mothers pass the gay gene,
and if some of them resent men, and if there’s a genetic correlation between
dislike of men and the gay gene, then favoring the gay gene will favor
woman disinclined to liking men.)
Once upon a time midwives were burned at the stake
by financially jealous doctors.
This has nothing to do with gender.
Perfectly child-productive women deservedly make
up half, plus or minus (presently plus) the legal and medical
professions.
The ranks of those informing and attempting to free us, bravely,
seem indeed to have females in the majority.
Joslyn Matilda Gage obviously was a woman, and she
constructed a message of freedom, equality and love.
Were she of a different frame of mind, living today, she's
be one of the world's most talented hedge fund managers,
deservedly, possibly very attractive, and producing babies just
as she did in her actual life.
The emotionally disturbed people in the military industrial
complex, and the ego deficients in the banking sector all
share flawed parenting, for the most part, owing to a morality
of judging instead of loving and forgiving (and for children
recognition, though they should naturally come to understand
personal self-proof of self-value comes from selflessness.
somehow conflating female equality with some nefarious purpose
when what's operative is control alliances.
The license to judge is the license to control and enslave.
The rich demagogue subs monopoly for capitalism (simplifying) and the
mouthpiece demonizes and makes afraid of being demonizing anyone not
liking it.
This has nothing to do with genderism.
This may be one construct connecting witchhunt with "sociobiologic apoptosis,"
on the East page.
PETER PAN SYNDROME
(Boy failed to develop masculine traits
due to intense limitation by mother.)
PREVIOUSLY MAN-HATING MOTHER THE PRESUMPTIVE CAUSE OF MALE HOMOSEXUALITY
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality
GAY GENE ONLY PASSES MATERNALLY (BUT THAT WOULD BE EMINENTLY
CONSISTENT WITH, NOT CONTRADICTORY OF, THE NON-BIOLOGIC PSYCHIATRIC BASIS)
(I say non-biologic not to imply psychiatric disorder, but only to distinguish
biology vs. relationship, as basis. After a few babes, a few more for other purposes,
with, for instance, the Spartan Army recently all but proved to have been a gay army,
all signalling a numerical genetic advantage for the group. After most generations,
prior to history’s being written, optimal occurrence “developmentally,” which occurrence
is essentially a dead-issue proved, would be the natural result. But we know it’s genetic
too by way of the linked proof and the fact of those at the center of witchhunt to judge to
control to enslave having been process self-produced hypocritical gays.
Witchhunt of one, or the scapegoating of convenience, by the person whose morality
is I’m perfect and noone else is, is the Dale Akiki scapegoating incident (opinion.)
It enables allies to enslave.
Witchhunt is the rich demagogue replacing monopoly for capitalism (simplifying) and the
mouthpiece demonizing and making afraid of being demonized whomever does not like it.
UNSELF-AWARE LESBIANS
FAVORED PRODUCTION OF THE GAY GENE THROUGH THAT PROCESS
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality
ALSO FAVOR, THEREBY, MAN-HATERS
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(Simple transitive property of math: If some mothers pass the gay gene,
and if some of them resent men, and if there’s a genetic correlation between
dislike of men and the gay gene, then favoring the gay gene will favor
woman disinclined to liking men.)
Once upon a time midwives were burned at the stake
by financially jealous doctors.
This has nothing to do with gender.
Perfectly child-productive women deservedly make
up half, plus or minus (presently plus) the legal and medical
professions.
The ranks of those informing and attempting to free us, bravely,
seem indeed to have females in the majority.
Joslyn Matilda Gage obviously was a woman, and she
constructed a message of freedom, equality and love.
Were she of a different frame of mind, living today, she's
be one of the world's most talented hedge fund managers,
deservedly, possibly very attractive, and producing babies just
as she did in her actual life.
The emotionally disturbed people in the military industrial
complex, and the ego deficients in the banking sector all
share flawed parenting, for the most part, owing to a morality
of judging instead of loving and forgiving (and for children
recognition, though they should naturally come to understand
personal self-proof of self-value comes from selflessness.
Think about it. No one could espouse the family values of the
religious right but the religious right.
DISCLAIMER:
NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONE
IDENTIFIED/IDENTIFIABLE OR OF ANY OF THEIR
RELATION(S.)
OPINION. SUPPOSITION. THEORY.
ALSO REFLECTS OPINION, SUPPOSITION, THEORY AS
TO EVENTS OR ACTIONS REGARDING OR CAUSED BY
SAID EXPRESS OR IMAGINABLE PERSONS OR THEIR
RELATIONS.
Anita Bryant--divorced.
Anita's son came out.
(Nothing known as to the validity of same.)
Is it the aspiration of the young adult seeking a mate
to marry a witchhunt-purveyor?
(All/any intimation(s) imaginable only reflect
theory/supposition/opinion.)
Where the super-straight conflicted guy attacks the
wrongly presumed gay gay, it's like the selfish paranoid
clown mistaking any vulnerable-looking person.
It for a fact is often a married psychiatrist with children.
What enables the Dale Akiki-type case is the rich demagogue
(simplifying) subbing capitalism with monopoly and the mouthpiece
first demonizing, then associating with the demonized, anyone
not liking it. Men and women are equally guilty, playing the
only I'm without fault routine--which defines paranoia.
Linking a comment at CNET imminently as to
people interested in religion supposedly being nuts, as if
it's game for the DSM-5:
The people interested in God aren't crazy, The people
bending it to witchhunt/transference are temporarily
confused and wasting their lives so as to serve billionaires
practicing divide and conquer.
In the Jewish Bible, at the point of Christ's introduction
(the entry to the Christian Bible,) Christ identifies the
person I think is Nostradamus' "third anti-Christ," which would
have been a logical conceptualization for Nostradamus, though
he would have learned from his father the full Gematria
(earliest Hebrew coding, very much Nostradamian, the latter
imitative, though yes, Nostradamus would also have
been a Kabbalah master, after his father.)
As you know, the world's billionaires, the ones controlling
the monopoly-sustaining puppets, is meeting soon, with
internet anonymity likely being something they most wish
ended.
It's on that anti-Christ thing that I disagree with John Hogue on.
I can't guarantee it, but I'm presently inclined to let my host
know my identify if necessary.
Life is emergent. Special life, perhaps, can be emerged.
Witchhunt is the false ideologue, putting it simply, replacing
the vaunted capitalism with monopoly, the mouthpiece
threatening associating with the earlier conveniently demonized
anyone disliking it.
Transference at its logical end is fearing anyone resembling the
obnoxious prior. That's everyone fighting in the streets, which
happens to be the endpoint of the Jewish Bible.
That's a psychiatric prophesy. It's a moral prophesy where it's
translated as every person believing only her/him self (with both
sexes equally falling prey to transference) as being devoid of
fault.
I will discipline myself to just do Nostradamus for the time being.
Look for dates after today's, which is 6/2/2013, on that page.
Bye.
6/6/2013
URL for this location
Or
http://goo.gl/L61np
Here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=XEQdvYFMBAU#!
Canadian Minister Hellyer confirms 4 ET species' presence,
American control by a neo-Nazi "military junta," and world sufference
at the hands of a banking cabal.
That cabal existed for generations. If I speculate the Rothschilds
are part of it, then know that family married into the Papal family
several generations ago, by some sources (Aldobrini family/Pope
Clement.)
If you run across a Jewish person their likelihood of having anything
to do with it would be likely less than if you run across a non-Jew.
Many more non-Jews are connected with banks acting in concert
with the historic banking elite, now cabal, to which the Minister
refers.
I think we're closely related to one of the ET's.
I think we're lucky in that it's the really special one.
I think the Minister's comments as to our being humbled, along
with everything else he said with stunning eloquence and
compassion, are testament to our innate better nature as a
species.
But he unified us around the Golden Rule.
For multiple years during this theory's
unfolding (it's scope and nooks and crannies
can extend further than initially meets the eye)
it has all along been the fact of the Golden Rule as
moral summary that has been the key commonality
as to the "Eastern religion" and the "Western religion"
("after a date.")
As I indicate being famously already known, for the
non-initiates, is the Vatican envoy Father Matteo had
discovered the Official Confucian Master in China was
also the head of China's Jewish Congregation, which
existence stunned him upon his discovery of that.
One of the 2 endpoints (not counting "travel to the stars," a dividend)
is proofs of relation (to our teachers, intimately, and as to the
mechanics for proving a real experiment for our benefit has
occurred (mitochondrial matches should extend to the
Kaifeng Jews and probably to key Arab sub-populations.)
That happens to be the core of the Chinese religion after
a date, and so that stands out as a most rational basis
of proof that we are in a conveyed experiment literally to
the point of it bearing a 2 pronged experimental element.
Jewish prophesy, and Catholic prophesy, and Protestant
grounding in freedom, equality and love, are actually
all confirmed, and Nostradamus himself embraced Catholic
prophesy as being valid, and brought to his work the
knowledge and understanding of ancient Jewish knowledge
that partly informed his own ability.
These prophesies hold validity in one form or another.
They are conveyed.
I think they prove math, morality and history are one
and the same.
I think we may have reason to be simultaneously
humbled but also proud of the high likelihood that
we're intensely related to one of the visiting ET's, and,
that it's most likely the most endearing to one's
aspirations for knowing good.
They are the ones who believe information lives, they
almost certainly make use of this knowledge in traveling
to the stars, and they are the ones telling us specific
informations live.
We either are learning of a Nazi cabal, a financial cabal
and ET's and nothing more; or, this is also a moment of
revelation. It would have to entail proofs of relation and proofs
of original information.
But, should it be the case special bad information is among
us, and there actually is a name that comes to us from
prophesy that would match that description, then it must be
our conveyors are waiting for us to enable living love to
emerge, one way or another.
The Catholics conveyed that it was conveyed to them
that whole nations can have informational life (I believe
this was during the Fatima incident.)
The haters and the ego defenders bent on colonizing their
"own" in America, as well as other nations, and Minister
Hellyer conceded Canada's defenselessness to the power
of these cabals, especially the military junta, while also
lamenting the wasting of the sacrifice of the men and women
who died fighting hate during World War II, all suffer from
what, I think, is best described by Patch Adams, which, for
me, with me not knowing at all how that doctor would feel
about this, stems from an ancient witchhunt formula that
worked like "Gray's Sports Almanac" in "Back to the Future,"
and was not a product of human design.
Adams says these people lack the love of a mother,
in one video (and presumably it's and/or a father, as
I would think should be added.)
This issue is covered in "The Help" particularly well.
Witchhunt replaced love with judging, which is transference,
in large measure, in the mental health world.
These needs to scapegoat and ego defend, for lack of
the time, more than anything else, thus being
shorthand describers of "Ishmael" and "Isaac"
allegorically, with ego defense a natural result of
thousands of years of scapegoating as well as from
the same deprivations of the birthright of a child
needing love and recognition that has afflicted many
in the West, seem to seal the deal as to prophesy
appearing fulfilled and as to explaining our present
experience.
This is just a theory rich with disclaimers as
to characterizations imagined or real being only
resultant of theory, supposition and opinion.
However, if this theory should hold some validity,
then its advice appropriately would be to join
others saying do not be afraid and encourage
those in dispute over the Temple Mount to
gather there in love, instead of judgement,
to that proof of relation can be offered, and
so that love a living information can be born.
Information becomes material.
http://www.tgdaily.com/general-sciences-features/72040-researchers-achieve-quantum-teleportation-between-atomic-systems-ove
Quick Understanding Of The Theory.
I think we're living information in a conveyed
proving wherein witchhunt is the gradient.
The only times from this moment I'll use
the word witchhunt anew is on this page, which
I haven't updated for a long time.
Witchhunt's why so much the population just
gets more addicted to judging, another more
addicted to ego defense.
It's all transference of scapegoating, mollification
and ego defense and the reactions to that,
ever escalating along the divide and conquer
knowingly applied formula.
People subscribe for personal gain to both elements
along genuine scalar degrees.
They're at war in the Middle East, which fact may
be allegorically understood in terms of two
dysfunctional half-brothers, Isaac and Ishmael,
the former allegorically understandable as having
existed in the trial of fire.
Those elements are to different degrees obviously
in league, with representatives from each gleefully
suffering from both.
From Thomas Jefferson to Oz (Joslyn Matilda Gage,)
to Abraham Lincoln to our present time it is difficult to
avoid this theory's element of U.S. centrality.
The U.S. has been not only a purported melting pot
of peoples, but a melting pot of beliefs.
SUPPORT PAGES ARE
UNDERGOING A QUICK RE-WRITE.
They're more or less updated in order of
form priority.
I'm being careful to not delete too much as
there's a distinct stage during which
my own outlook on the issues evolved.
THE THEORY WILL BE ESSENTIALLY
COMPLETE UPON THE COMPLETION
OF THE NOSTRADAMUS PAGE, SO LONG
AS THE SUPPORT PAGES ARE ADEQUATE
TO ADVANCING THE MANY ELEMENTS.
HOWEVER, AFTERWARD, AVAILABLE
FROM MYSELF, THERE'S AN INFINITY OF
SUPPORT FOR THIS THEORY, WHICH
I'LL BE ADDING CASUALLY ACROSS THE
BOARD, PRIORITIZING ITEMS OF MOST
PRESENT INTEREST.
The equivalent to this summary on the East page,
also getting re-done, explains the mechanics
of the idea of a conveyed lesson.
This page is nonetheless important
for the same reason Pascal became
religious when made a math-morality-event
stream connection (I theorize) upon his
(my theorized) study of Nostradamus.
That's not the least bit far-fetched. Nostradamus
was a famous light for all of Pascal's ilk.
The work of Shakespeare following Pascal's is
confirmatory of the genesis of Shakespeare's
thinking and purpose.
I have to admit this website has had very
messy spots at times.
Esoterica is potentially disorienting to
novices. I was an involuntary novice after one
very very convincing dream (father staring eye to
eye till I acknowledged, with greater detail than
if he were sitting next to me.)
West Side Story
West Side Story presents the 2 deficiencies identified in
this website: 1) territorial tribalism (first coined
by Jane Goodall;)
2) it essentially spoonfeeds parental
shortcoming.
Parental childishness, pacification, and arrested growth
are all direct results of the mastery of fear, the transfer of
that fear, the association with the demonized, the divisions
based on that, and the total naive self-worthlessness resulting
the replacement of one's own birthright and equality with
paranoia and fear of being oneself.
It's a perfect formula for demagogue billionaires to
(my Dad was a shrink who would never use this
word, of course, and, I ordinarily would readily honor
that sensibility, and, I've a career of my own; however,
the application and the impact are perfect: they're
yuckily masturbating on you.)
They do that for the same reasons you suffer from the
process.
If they're privileged beneficiaries of the process they may
perform in male-only skits, in women's clothes, in the woods,
in between sessions of proving to themselves they know
better how to control you, for yourselves, they think.
Or, they may simply be arrogant.
an ill-suited mother?
super wealthy. yet lacking recognition.
They're identical to the kids in West Side Story.
From Russia With Love
1) Genl Gogol says to Rosa Klebb paranoid
schizophrenics make excellent material for the
KGB as much as they do for Spectre.
2) Spectre plays the Russians against the
British for its own benefit.
The whole purpose of demonizing is associating
foes with the demonized. Then, the despot isn't
the problem, the falsely accused party is.
That's been alluded to innumerable times in numerous
formats, such as The Twilight Zone.
It's Divide and Conquer, it's stupidly transparent on
Occ chat boards on the part of trolls, its falsely laid
for blame on the victims, just as the poor are blamed
for their own poverty, and the part about relying on
paranoid schizophrenics is perfectly analogous to
the Basij or Matilda Joslyn Gage's
(by way of L. Frank Baum)
munchkins, in "The Wizard of Oz."
2/26/2012
"The Help" speaks volumes about the West's social,
economic,political and psychological history.
That "Skeater" sound much like ""Scout"" from
"To Kill a Mockingbird" is less significant than Skeater's
being analogous to Lara in ""Dr. Zhivago,"" for this movie is about
control freaks for economic advantage.
However, whereas Karl Marx mistook crony capitalism for capitalism,
"The Help" pertains the psychological
self-destruction of the control freak; it offers a parallel to "Ruined"
where Minnie is unfairly scapegoated in
by her husband in turn from her master; and, the psychological
self-destruction within the controlling class
runs parallel to the genetic self-process-induced changes proposed
in my own website to have been proven
by the civilization of Transference and control for the sake of
"Divide and Conquer" proven simultaneously
in math, morality and history (and cross-directionally: history
to morality to math and morality to history to
math work equally well, as the proving is cross-simultaneous,
and with the East now providing total
experimental value.)
Aibileen Clark teaches Skeater:
"You are kind, you are smart, you are important."
Those who are products of many generations of demonization
for the creation of the opportunity of
control are often sufferers of transference of fear / pain,
the need to pacify (mollify,) and simple
arrogance.
They thus are precisely least able to do what Aibileen can do as described above.
"The Help's" message pertains everyone.
If you are hired to watch over others in your employ,
you will no longer expect them to lick your ass.
Charlotte Phelan's (Skeater's mother's) concern for Skeater's
"naturalness" is in play thanks to me.
The original basis of demonization caused gene bearers to marry
heteros'ly and thus those most hostile are likeliest bearers.
They can concomitantly be masters of the transfer of fear,
the aware privileged beneficiaries
of transference, or simply given to overbearing control
but not self-aware (as proposed in "J. Edgar Hoover.")
The opposite of Divide and Conquer is royalty assuming
whatever name best suits their
regional assignment.
The East was devoid of demonization for power through control.
They simply had emporers
and Jane Goodall's run of the mill territorial tribalism, which the West
otherwise would also
have simply had.
However, the East is proposed by myself as being morally
otherwise identical, and, actually,linked in that regard.
That has thus provided a full-Earth, full-history experiment.
(LESS WORDY VERSIONS)
ONE AND THE SAME
What if it were 300 MM people?
Corruption at others' expense is just like the
colonization of the salt mines in India.
Please get this guy some help and please
do not fear enforcing your rights even if the
person next to you does not like you.
I really could simply reverse (done) Coulter / Angle / Norton on themselves
and wonder who their puppet masters, should they exist
(ever the legal paranoid,) might be.
Could it be Gov. Brewer is working for a brewer?
(scapegoating (my supposition) for water?)
This supposition feels like more than a coincidence and
solemn. Governor, there's been much stuff / Arizona
lately (will elucidate/job-family.) I actually, specifically, think you should
join OWS.
Cultures in the East have also had their tyrants
demonizing other cultures, enabling them to rumble.
Those tyrants have often called themselves divine.
But that is not the same slight of hand trick utilized
in the West, though but for that, I maintain, the
ideals sought have been utterly identical.
In the West it has been undeniable that power abhors
vacuums. Yet those ideals have always dangled
in front.
The West has employed demonizing so as to
associate any foe with the demonized.
It's family / workplace / play-lot judging for
control for scapegoating on steroids.
Lately, the hypocrisy has been used in inward fashion,
against nations' own people.
Apart from that I'm unsure what it is: the internet
(the gig's up;) a logical extreme in scapegoating and
arrogance out of control like the rapist who finally
forces himself, or all the above.
Vietnam
The URL for this location.
also, a link pairing
applied currently
The Wizard of Oz and L. Frank Baum
(see Psychiatry as to "Ruined,"
(I happen to dig music--a taste)
"Ruined" is a dash a repeat of THIS.
Except: Element of inadequacy.
Means absolutely nothing whatsoever, past one line
of experts after another, except:
Fear-transferers, mollifiers, and quite insultingly arrogant
persons limiting others.
the Neda / U.S. pepper spraying / "Ruined" analogy
Besides economic slight of hand, the puppet masters, the puppets, and their scared and offensive munchkins, the very picture of transference, whether Baum realized that or not (not likely by name given his dating,) creating corruption and a casino economy effect,
there is this.
This can only contribute to the inadequacies caused in some cases by this.
which I've
considered being the third in a trilogy, after
Oz and The Wiz inasmuch as it's about
(to me) transference pushed onto the unsuspecting)
Recall you agree.
(by reading already, let alone reading further)
To me, the men in "Ruined" in part can be compared
with cop-thugs macing and pepper-spraying girls
in peaceful OWS protests in favor of wall of transference,
illusion, and sneaky limitation.
Mt. Rushmore and Gutzon Borglum
The Alamo
Before I write the narrative (I'm feelin' competent as
to Baum, I'll wing it as to Broglum / The Alamo, and there's
much to prioritize across this website and much in current
events spontaneous ideas that come before that,) here's
also, a link pairing
applied currently
The Wizard of Oz and L. Frank Baum
(see Psychiatry as to "Ruined,"
(I happen to dig music--a taste)
"Ruined" is a dash a repeat of THIS.
Except: Element of inadequacy.
Means absolutely nothing whatsoever, past one line
of experts after another, except:
Fear-transferers, mollifiers, and quite insultingly arrogant
persons limiting others.
the Neda / U.S. pepper spraying / "Ruined" analogy
Besides economic slight of hand, the puppet masters, the puppets, and their scared and offensive munchkins, the very picture of transference, whether Baum realized that or not (not likely by name given his dating,) creating corruption and a casino economy effect,
there is this.
This can only contribute to the inadequacies caused in some cases by this.
which I've
considered being the third in a trilogy, after
Oz and The Wiz inasmuch as it's about
(to me) transference pushed onto the unsuspecting)
Recall you agree.
(by reading already, let alone reading further)
To me, the men in "Ruined" in part can be compared
with cop-thugs macing and pepper-spraying girls
in peaceful OWS protests in favor of wall of transference,
illusion, and sneaky limitation.
Mt. Rushmore and Gutzon Borglum
The Alamo
Before I write the narrative (I'm feelin' competent as
to Baum, I'll wing it as to Broglum / The Alamo, and there's
much to prioritize across this website and much in current
events spontaneous ideas that come before that,) here's
.
------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTES TO MYSELF (IN PUBLIC VIEW (I'VE OFTEN SAID:))
Job / Family / Honest ; This tool is my own best task management system for this project.
L. Frank Baum consummately identified the strategy of puppet-masters owning
puppets who transfer fear. He was so savvy as to this it's likely he understood
transference at the psychiatric level simultaneously with its growth in terms of being
understood in a nascent psychiatric field.
Yet, he was a vicious racist in the manner of one who would be perfectly
untroubled by the "Trail of Tears."
His father was a devout German / Scots-Irish Methodist, but, by the name
Benjamin Baum, it is unavoidable to speculate the
Baum's may have been of substantially Jewish ancestry.
He was the seventh of nine children born to Cynthia Ann Stanton Baum.
L. Frank Baum was married to Maud Gage, the youngest daughter
of Matilda Joslyn Gage, advocate for equality for women with men
and those then legally enslaved with their then masters.
His mother in her own right was NOT notably a feminist activist.
The possibility is real that Cynthia was
much more invested in sympathy than history records.
But while, were that the case, even if she had justifiably been unhappy with
the annoying self-claimed authority of men, often on the part
of men not deserving of any responsibility beyond tying their
own shoes, it is highly unlikely she transferred those feelings
to her sons.
L. Frank Baum married Gage, Matilda's daughter.
L. Frank Baum's father, on the other hand, Benjamin Ward Baum,
could have been an abusive child raiser (not sexually speaking,
but as in contra-distinction to raising with kindness and with
using each opportunity for applying reason. I think it was
Khalil Gibran who first said our children are our equals.)
Matilda Gage, L. Frank Baum's mother-in-law, likely steals the show.
It would be my guess the real person most responsible for
"The Wizard of Oz" was Matilda, and actually with L. Frank's
Aunt having set the stage (figuratively, and literally in terms of its
groundwork.)
And tonight, I wonder if Matilda and L. Frank Baum's Aunt interacted.
A feminist on grounds of equality by birthright, not because of how it can be made to
fit with competing traditionalists, not just self-serving men but also more religious traditional
female suffragettes, but who then became theosophist because she sensed a greater
morality, Matilda was in a sense very similar to my own way of thinking. Each story
part of a collection of stories.
Frankly, more than in the case of Susan B. Anthony or Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Matilda
was more invested in the sexual equality aspect, rather than the prospect of merely the
contribution of "feminine morality."
I'm with Matilda, personally. I only see equality. And I obviously see each corner of an
overall story in science, morality and event streams being part of a whole.
While Anthony's and Stanton's stances seem, familialy, for persons not as experienced
from history as to the accidental impact one's thoughts might transfer, more benign,
Matilda's relation to her son-in-law was not such, and was late enough in his years, I think,
that she could not have instilled feelings of inadequacy. In view of Matilda's high
science and morality combined, I would have been happy to know her, and I think it
would have been almost impossible for her to pretty much hurt anything at all.
Well then, let's at some point take a look at Benjamin Ward Baum,
as the finger is pointing at him.
L. Frank's parents lost four of their children. It is impossible to know what,
if anything, in particular, could have caused a need for L. Frank Baum to
viciously scapegoat, all the while being the master-author-inventor
of understanding Government by Transference (those munchkins
spreading fear on behalf of puppets hired by puppet-masters.)
However, I think many professionals would be interested in knowing
more about that father and how he may have reacted to the death of
one or more of his kids, and particularly, if L. Frank was at all involved in
the death of any of them.
Gage
Lippman
Baum
Stanton
Susan B. Anthony
not to mention against Israel.
This website says it was no human's fault.
Ostensibly, King Tut, the instruction always having
been to not judge, which is for control, for scapegoating, for demonizing,
for associating with the demonized, for "Divide and Conquer," for
enslaving one's own, while your counterparts enslave their own.
This website says it was no human's fault.
Ostensibly, King Tut, the instruction always having
been to not judge, which is for control, for scapegoating, for demonizing,
for associating with the demonized, for "Divide and Conquer," for
enslaving one's own, while your counterparts enslave their own.
Many nations are passed that.
I think the moral references identify living morality.
The proof is in how this guy's folks traveled here.
You can travel as though without regard for what we think
of as time, which measures distance, if you can surround yourself
in an energy that can take you through a barrier the way gravity
travels past the bounds binding the other known forces, but, also
possibly, if you understand
there are different stages by which information can live.
As to Dr. Nestle's work, transfer of fear, the wasting of people's own
lives, as included voluntary obesity. Only where one finds what I call
"Government by Transference" does one find deliberate self-wasting.
Elsewhere, there's success and overindulgence, but nowhere there
deliberate self-wasting of ones' lives.
All these factors reflect lives wasted. Total self-limitation.
The persons inflicting the damage are transfering fear originally
intended for themselves, or, are arrogant and wanting to
profit from the carnage.
I've disclosed earlier: I'm an emergency landing survivor who
openly flies drunk.
(on judging in science and morality simultaneously--
1st and 3rd comments entered by holygenes)
Meanwhile, back at the farm, the masters of scapegoating and division,
and their allies, the arrogant, who instead of dispensingwith their arrogance
in their toilet apply it to replace yourfree enterprise with their (often self-unaware) fraud, are actually right now utterly blowing away the health of yourself and your family.
I'm back (12/22/2011:) Judging and simply ignoring in terms of different
willingnesses as toopenness, in science and morality, will equally doom us.
This is very important. This website is not apocalyptic generally.
But Severn Suzuki was obviously addressing a room full of annoying
obnoxious, arrogant, childish people.She's some kind of special, blessed.
She is the voice of science and morality. Gazed at with judgement, a
little with a half-spoonof self-identification and sympathy, though 13 at the
time, she was then, and is presumably now, a total utter giant compared
to the tiny tiny tiny impswho shared her room when she gave that speech.
As I've said often, as to my own theory, this is not an
apocalyptic website. However, it is easy to contemplate that
this will discreetly and suddenly end your children's
future, whereas, otherwise, they should (and they actually will--
I think that) travel to the stars.
Childish issues and arrogance will have to end because,
humor me, I happen to think, by my theory,
history will turn definitionally when scapegoating ends.
On a most practical level, no one loses.
The North won. The South lost. My in-laws live exactly
halfway between Valley Forge and Gettysburg, and that is a factor
for me tonight, for I have experienced each.
World: there is no slavery in the U.S.
Guess what: U hav 2 transform.
It's Egypt. It's China. China is sort of this, sort of that.
Sort of successful cause it's Communist.
Sort of successful cause it's free.
I'm going to call it for a night. On 12/22/2011, this was
quite spontaneous.
(THIS IS NOT INTENDED BEING AN ACADEMIC LICENSE TO DO THAT.
DO NOT. THAT'S ALL THE MORE IMPORTANT IF YOU SHOULD BE
GIVEN TO DEPENDENCY, WHICH
I AM PROPOSING IS MORE FREQUENT IN SCAPEGOATING CULTURES
BECAUSE OF THE FOLLOWING:)
Broader Perspective, Arbitrary Assumptions Caused
By a Culture of Limitations and Fear:
more gays, particularly more from homes process self-producing ones learning from a culture of profit by hypocrisy, fear
more bald guys, with them being slightly likelier
to carry a gay gene (false presumption less likely gay, so
likelier associated with a spouse coming from a community scaring the gay gene
into a hetero marriage)
more alcohol dependence gene prevalence: (gene favored in a community governed by limitation and fear (from the stress,) so likelier associated with a spouse coming from a community scaring the gay gene into a hetero marriage;)yet, they'll be scapegoated despite the genetic factor andthe fact of that factor's having been favored by the culture of transference in the first place
Lamarchianism (traits genetically in-bred from environmental
influences being passed to the next generation) has recently been
proved active
in humans (from work with the very great many new
messenger RNA's
recently discovered.) So the above is very much about
the choice of
turning positive or turning feral by whether
or not a society is given to control by fear.
Alexander Vargas of the University of Chile
by way of Sharon Begley, Newsweek, 9/18/2009
"'"I think academia has discouraged experiments testing
environmental modification of inheritance,'
because the inheritance of acquired characteristics—Lamarckism--
drives the self-appointed evolution police crazy."
ON THE JOB
The fear of being demonized enables obnoxious people to damage a person's job performance.
If you're a restauranteur or other, do you have a maitre 'd or equivalent chasing your
own customers away? Are you a total jerk?
Paranoia transferred from parent to child is the basis of some autism
(my theory.)
It is also the basis of why you cannot conquer your space
in industry.
ECONOMICS
Of course the slandering of the "99%" as socialist, when what they must be considered
being about primarily is ending the fraud, cheating, and ending the diversionary
tactics of scapegoating and dividing--substituting monopoly
until the U.S. and Putin are mirror images.
THE INTERNET
The Amish
(my favorite Quaker-originating link was blocked)
in Pennsylvania, the Orthodox in the Catskills
repel from modernism because of a distrust--a distrust of
suspected presumption.
I can relate to that.
Our technology is powerful. Our political ideals
have been corrupted along the way to being put
into practice.
There are others ostensibly advancing morality attempting
to quash all things academic not for that at all but simply
because they have conflated being control freaks with
morality.
This website has ever ongoing found that an
annoying, disturbed nuisance, and they are sufferers of
transference or a need to mollify.
What truth can be true if it must deny information?
Patience is my weakest suit. It's just, simply hereditary.
But adored.
But explaining the connections between transference
and arrogance and the distraction from a broken
game in energy, transportation, health care, banking
the relation between the owners of production and
the rest of the world, here, and there, with economics
being homeostatic, mathematical and unyielding to
anything but honesty, is in spite of that very easily explained.
Simply deny one fraud's abuse and then another's and
noone need lose out.
The more there are people here or there, the more there
is need here or there.
There is simply nothing to fear from one another so
long as there is noone denying birthright: to
education and fulfillment.
America's founders included Thomas Paine and Thomas Jefferson,
each aware of UFO's, believe it or not. The former guessed that
simply negated traditional morality. The latter was open and
insisted on openness. That was the basis of the Univ. of Va.
(nothing to do w/ me--still in So. Calif.)
But America's guarantees amount to a creed:
free, equal and happy, which is identical to the purported
ideals from whence it came: free, equal and happy.
My theory is we are in an experiment designed to prove
those are living aspects of information and that discovering
that (--that fact, then--) will concomitantly afford a new science
and technology.
My science-related pages deal with physics at a level I can
understand, which guarantees you can too.
That personalities can be seen point-to-point implies
something. I've simply guessed a novel energy. I've simply
guessed that must be of a nature similar to the behavior of
gravity in a manner conducive to string theory.
But I'm interested in more, because I suspect we are more, and so
I'm interested in Garrett Lisi's "Theory of Everything."
ON THE HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS
(I may not address this directly.
The fighting in the streets among youngsters and the insulting amongst
adults is addressed generally elsewhere. The issue being"Government by
Transference," all applications are readily understandable by all, so where particular
hurtful mistakes are avoidable in my discussion, I willavoid them.)
THE FAMILY
Behavior self-destructive of the home, the breakage
of American families, is but a more elegant
version of "Ruined."
Can it be any wonder women engage
in transference too?
Masculine insecure men teaching boys arrested growth
(boys hurt animals, men don't)
induce their sons to assert gender inordinately.
Boys should not be watching football, let alone just anyone's
team playing, to the point of its impacting school performance.
Men cheat out of the fear of being wrongly ferreted out as gay.
believed by myself censored at LiveScience because of a comment
close to the following:
AUTISM explosive because of the paranoia. Denied life if you
talk to the person next to you.
Hello Texas? If you need to carry a phallic symbol to class, you are not welcome
to submit your resume for hospital work. You can be tolerated and accepted as
a troublesome neighbor somewhere else BUT: patients require compassion.
Boys hurt animals. Men don't. You are too childish to work at a hospital.
holygenes.weebly.com is a lawyer currently invested in media stuff but who
used to work in the hospital setting
If I were still in that position, I would almost be tempted to rule out any resumes
coming from Texas. Can you find a way to be a bull other than being a jerk?
Obviously, in some families, transference, mollification and ego defense
are such that for us to survive childhood, and, for us now to survive as
a species, childhood may be seen as being comparable to the
duckling at risk of being neglected by its worm-providing parent.
Humans are infinitely variable. Life exists everywhere across the
universe and is likewise infinitely variable.
We are not robots because
we are not perfect yet not limited.
(That defines soul mates thusly:
"Teflon;" faultless)
There are wrong-doers to go around. The (warning: graphic:) arrogant
(also)
have caused as much damage as the scapegoaters.
simpatia e amor da Califórnia para você no Brasil
Which game theorist sparked the current de facto credit blow-out
is a curiosity
(you guessed right--I am not going to seek that,)
but thousands / hundreds of thousands of
mortgage brokers in the field surely knew something was wrong
but were expected to push out deals. Banks everywhere,
including in Germany, let alone Greece, participated.
Social Security, Medicare, student loans, Brazil's currency,
India's currency, China, are all the fall guys, along with the
interest you earn on your savings, including that of your parents,
who dutifully prepped for retirement, buying sometimes
tax-locked securities, precisely what the funny-bankers
want to supplant your Social Security with.
No. I'm basically capitalist.
structure / process
Sructure for good is intensely easy, while preserving
burning ambition, which is useful.
However:
free. equal. happy.
Adam Smith was slandered. He advocated safety nets.
corny familiar and simple but true.
Demagogues are capitalizing on the corruption and those
who are arrogant.
They are forcing themselves on you.
This is abuse for profit and abuse for arrogance.
I've personal ideas as to overlapping curiosities
and mistakes on everyone's part.
So for my part I think the scapegoaters must
stop scapegoating right now.
The arrogant actually are a group that has to
suck it up right now.
The scapegoaters are the most urgently threatening and
could be understood as transference at a local level
taken to a wider level. That is fractal. That is confirming.
The world is reverse engineering from trust.
from free equal and happy.
We have to do this forthwith.
The Islamic world has to stop blaming the Israelis
for their own scapegoaters. I am in the U.S.
I cannot take my arguments beyond my shores and
will not do so now. I actually believe in my
compatriots' better natures and would do whatever
I'm supposed to do alongside them.
We are a half-narrative and you will now understand it.
The end product is only peace.
One big party.
The false choices will become transparent.
Demagoguery on one side. Right decisions on the
other (New Deal) but borrowed from banks using
your savings' earning value as the source of the
funds being borrowed for the solution.
The alternative: replacing scapegoating and arrogance.
And... U can't even move from state to state
if you have a risk factor.
This page will have everything wrong from
people imposing their need to scapegoat or to be
arrogant, but all who have an idea how that works
will need no details, while all who can't begin
to understand will never do so.
Government by Transference Married to Arrogance
and Universal Limitations and Arbitrary Affects
Holygenes sympathizes with the OWS movement.
Those purporting to be democratic but in love
with Plato (we know what's best -- all for the
greater good) have progressed from
heads-I-win to tails-you-lose, first, but now
want to establish that in an economy that's more
fully a casino economy; and, along the way, they've
currently turned our economy into quite the casino indeed.
It's one idea after another, including great looking
New Deal programs from the would-be Progressives,
except they're financed by those who pervert our
democracy.
Plato becomes irrelevant when his followers aims are
not constructive and when their means are transparently
fraudulent.
The greater part of the participants in the OWS movement
embrace capitalism but want to free it from
the self-serving, false rhetoric.
just so much smoke and mirrors from the scapegoaters
and the arrogant
currently.)
This is about balancing ideal with survival.
We are all connected to one.
I am presenting a very specific theory utilizing
all major religions, most other religions collectively,
all of Earth geographically, all human
recorded history and experimental and observational science
considered distinguishably because I'm proposing
it was intended that they be considered in that manner
in relation to the overall theory.
It's simply how it works out, which is certainly
one reason why it looks interesting to myself.
There
is no separation from Ishmael.
U all have overlapping curiosities.
U all believe in the same thing.
Ambition and incentivizing technological explosiveness
is not inconsistent with compassion. Adam Smith is
one co-opted guy, one guy taken out of context big-time.
I personally in this website propose we have no choice,
survival wise, but to make each other happy
absent the judging and thus the control, scapegoating,
pacification, ego defense (arrogance) and transference
(you pissed with the person near you cause he / she
resembles an obnoxious prior.)
I think this would be true even w/o the many layers of proposed
ideas of conveyed beliefs in information, technology and morality.
Even arrogant people can do good if they have
constructive structure to live in (that's a very specific
reference to structure and process.)
That means rules. That means education. That means
public health. That means no controlling people on the job.
That means if you have a formula that is rational and
efficient and compassionate, and allowing for ambition and
zeal for growth, but you are afraid to present that idea topersons given to
judging and thus the control, scapegoating,
pacification, ego defense (arrogance) and transference
(you pissed with the person near you cause he / she
resembles an obnoxious prior) then you can get electedbut then perish
with the rest of us.
Think now:
John F. Kennedy's "Profiles In Courage" is here and hereby
incorporated by reference.
There are bad people around. If I'm to not be afraid this is
not the time to advertise that. I cannot be a judger.
But I can appeal to everyone's sense of right and wrong.
They can then decide to be scapegoaters, arrogant pacifiers, or
believe that they have to behave lest their children, or themselves,
perish; or, they, may listen.
Being relaxed and happy is much easier than all that.
Prozac or a fruity spiked drink may help, but it's not that tough.
The following is doing right w/o getting demonized.
The following is living healthfully w/o getting demonized.
The following is telling gatekeepers to go to Hell, where they
may yet actually go.
The following is scapegoating bullshixxing hypocrites going to Hell.
COMING...
Having a job / family, I've throughout a lengthy process
used public notes to myself for their own most-conceivably-direct
personal planning value as well as to impart sunshine onto this
process. Seeing my own thoughts and plans evolve still
does not enable the would-be rip-off artist. I've got the goods
as to the science, the Bible, Nostradamus, living information, history.
This site aims for positive influence only, so I anticipate referencing
dumb events on a generic level only.
PUBLIC HEALTH: It's not just shafting a healthy environment; it's not
simply being fat to avoid being connected with the demonized, per some
arbitrary perversion. Bald men are slightly likelier to be gay precisely because
they are a product of communities that said gays don't deserve to live and then also favored, arbitrarily, bald men. It's every imaginable detail of
public health that's affected by the fear and concomitant perversions.
From body to mind, from mind to body. Possibly, the opposite of
freedom, which is fear and control, emperils not just mind and body, but
the soul itself.
The understanding that you are a computer with a soul
in a computer universe is already curing cancer.
Top economists in the business of presenting China as an economic
threat are hardly distinguishable from trolls on Chat Boards
concerned with OWS.
If people in the U.S. are treated fairly, including having
access to higher education, and if labor is valued, they will
be better prepared and will produce better products
for entering commerce and producing desired products
each aimed internationally.
If the Chinese leadership treated the larger part of its
population fairly, the natural homeostasis of economics
would bring higher wages along with democracy to
that larger part of that nation.
A nation's success is aligned with its greater population.
Higher wages for labor valued. A strong currency.
URL for this location
India's / Brazil's currencies clobbered by the Liq. Trap. Soc. Sec., Medicare,
student loans falsely blamed. The U.S. turned into its own carry trade in favor
of cheap dollars exported for purchase of stronger currencies all in support
of bad banks.
The med cartel entirely rigged.
(personal thought experiment only / nothing known of anyoneimaginable:)Imagine a Governor garners support by mustering the favor of scapegoaters. Suppose it's for a puppet-master. The puppet-master may only need her in power for something entirely unrelated.perhaps... control of water.perhaps.... for a brewer.Perhaps he has friends who like that sort of thing.They can propose such things as this.Applied. And applying my theory.
I also grew up with a large pic of JFK on my wall.It was actually par for the course. A local Teenage DemocratsTreasurer on his way to becoming President.Well, a common precocious thought. But real.I felt a connection strong enough that I'm willing to say thatnow despite the scorn that could bring.The Kennedy's as a family, if you trace their history, this because I am aware of their first half-narrative, are a transformational family.
I also grew up with a large pic of JFK on my wall.It was actually par for the course. A local Teenage DemocratsTreasurer on his way to becoming President.Well, a common precocious thought. But real.I felt a connection strong enough that I'm willing to say thatnow despite the scorn that could bring.The Kennedy's as a family, if you trace their history, this because I am aware of their first half-narrative, are a transformational family.
less wordy, data volume controlled, at FDL, in queu: HuffPo:
That Skeater's like Scout / "To Kill a Mockingbird"
is less significant than Skeater's being analogous to Lara in "Dr. Zhivago,"
for this movie is about control freaks for economic advantage.
Whereas Karl Marx mistook crony Kptlism for K'is
"The Help" pertains the psychlgcl self-destruction of the control freak,
offers a parallel to "Ruined" (Minnie's
scapegoated by her husband in turn fr her master;) the psychlgcl
self-destruction w/in the controlling class parallels genetic
self-process-induced changes proven by the culture of Transference and
control for the sake of Divide and Conquer--simultaneously in math, morality and history
bckwrd/frwrd. Where East identical but 4, then an experiment.
http://holygenes.weebly.com/
(O.K. to mirror this.)
Aibileen teaches Skeater:
"You are kind, you are smart, you are important."
Offspring of generations of dmnzatn creating control opportunity
are often sufferers of transference; the need to mollify;
arrogance--unable to say that to their kids.
"The Help" pertains all.
Employers forcing ass-licking are of same ilk.
Skeater's mom's concern for "naturalness" is important.
The origl basis of demonization caused gene bearers to marry
heteros'ly and thus those most hostile are likeliest bearers.
They can be masters of fear transference, prvlgd bnfcries
of that, or given to overbearing control but not self-aware (as proposed/
"J. Edgar Hoover.")
Divide and Conquer's opposite: royalty assumes names fitting
regional assignments.
East devoid of dmnzatn for power thru control. just emporers
+ Jane Goodall's territorial tribalism, which the West would also
have simply had
Welcome particularly from MSN, MSNBC,
where I'm registered as
ScincMraltyHist
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
Well, particularly inasmuch as the following explains a
simultaneous proving in science, morality and history
that incorporates the proof of a gay gene indeed, and since
at its core it includes Hitler’s having been famously feminine,
JFK’s killers having been substantially gay fascists, and
virtually all murderers of gays having proven being gay,
and of course the subject pastor is calling for a holocaust--
that’s was a capital status crime is and always has been it’s
all the more important that I add this disclaimer:
(DISCLAIMER:)NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANY
ONE EXPRESSLY OR IMAGINABLY IDENTIFIED, OR OF THAT
OF ANY OF SUCH PERSON(S) RELATION(S.) REFLECTS
PERSONAL OPINION AND SUPPOSITION ONLY.I BETTER ADD
HERE AND NOW THAT’S QUITE SINCERE.THE PASTOR MAY SIMPLY BE,
AS MANY HERE SAY, AN IDIOT
OR IN THE HOLOCAUST BUSINESS.
To presume the morality of murder of one arbitrary variation in an
ocean of infinite variation not simply among humans but all life,
including within all ever-evolving species in and living, ever
everywhere emergent universe, is as morally naive, obviously,
it is scientifically. Obviously the incidence of homosexuality
would have reached optimality long before the 2% of human history
during which there’s been some semblence of written record.
It’s long been known the East has a much small incidence. The
West has much more. Africa is anecdotally thought right in the middle.
Gays afford numerical genetic advantage to the species as a whole
by virtue of their slightly different social position (freer to branch
out in many areas of contemplation and discovery, vs. the caveman who
could only have one job: bring home a rabbit and some berries to eat.
It’s been quite conclusively discovered by one female archaeologist from
Britain how Sparta made use of its gays.
Honored, they constituted their army.)But the East / West are utterly
identical but for demonizing for the sake of the fear of demonization
(kill gays, make a world afraid of being wrongly ferreted out as gay.)
Then Jews, then nations were integrated (immigrants.) Majority here,
minority there. Minority here, majority there.
It’s fear mastered, because it process self-produced gays within the
families and communities that mastered
demonization for the value of division. Division affords blaming false
demons for the follly of despots, faux democrats, self-serving ideological
billionaire demagogues, billionairesperforming in the woods in women’s
clothes with no women deemed worthy of participating, men with suitcases
of Viagra telling women what they may/may not do with their uteri, and
even plenty simply rich beneficiaries of demonization, with the proof
of this additionally then one Ivy having been known as the “Gay Ivy.”
DISCLAIMER TIME AGAIN:
(IF IMAGINING SUCH INSTITUTION, OR ALSO SUCH
PLACE REFERRED TO HEREIN AS “THE WOODS...WITH MEN
DRESSED IN WOMEN’S CLOTHES,” SHOULD SUCH ENTITIES
BE IDENTIFIABLE,NOTHING HEREIN REFLECTS KNOWLEDGE OF
PARTICULAR CHARACTER AS TO SAID ENTITIES, INCLUDING
PERTAINING THIS SUBJECT
MATTER. EVERYTHING STATED HERE REFLECTSPERSONAL
THEORY AND SUPPOSTION ONLY.)
He can be a product of the process without practicing the “transference.”
They don’t have pacify. They don’t have to be arrogant. But it’s
transference, pacification and arrogance that define this holocaust only
differing in degree of judging
to control, to scapegoat, to mollify, to self-adulate.
http://pages.citebite.com/g2a2d0expuk
It’s long been known those arbitrarily presumed less likely gay
were favored by the demonizing, arbitrary, scientifically naive, and self-limiting,
self-life-wasting, self-enslaved communities are thereby slightly likelier to have
gained the gay gene. Hence, it’s generally easily found that bald men are just
slightly likelier gay.
It’s been demonstrated quite thoroughly at two major campuses most
particularly that later-born sons are slightly likelier developmentally
ending up gay. The basis is indeterminate: older mother; other
factor(s) readily contemplated.
But history proves the genetic link. It’s not simply
that virtually all murderers of gays to date have proven being gay,
including ones who flee to neighborhoods known favored by outward
fascists, including after they attacked persons they thought were gay
but who weren’t and who instead had their own biologic children at home.
DISCLAIMER TIME AGAIN:
NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONEEXPRESSLY OR
IMAGINABLY IDENTIFIED, OR OF THATOF ANY OF SUCH PERSON(S) RELATIONS.
It has long been famously the case the most preachers calling
for the murder of gays have had family later “come out,” or they
themselves have had episodes of“I’m gay.” “No wait. I’m not gay.”
Until recently it’s been a steady parade of Republican Religious Right
allies,gay-bashing mayors, etc., who’ve ultimately proved having had
gay relationships.Choices over time is morality equalling math. I think
the Eastern religions are utterly identical to Western,(I happen to think
by plan--conveyed) in a lesson and notw test in morality, history and
science.The simple fact of Western royals having enjoyed the exact
opposite of division--they assumed names per regional assignment--vs.
simply Eastern emporers, defines the gradient that provides what is
in fact a full human recorded history, full Earth, meta- experiment
in science, morality and history.
They prove free/equal/love.
Moses, Mohammed and Christ are representative of each. I think the
idea conveyed is thus more than an only-now readily understood proving
in science, morality and history. Because personalities have been seen
from point to point in “real time,” and because (this part
is a bit funky, I admit) the conveyors are simply here (from light
years away, such things as field propulstion or reverse gravity being
irrelevant to the distance,and because of a fast increasing
understanding of emergence and even] the such things as
the simple fact that Lamarckianism is actually real,--
http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2009/09/17/what-alters-our-genes.html
That’s a 2 way street. If one gets beaten on brain-wise by demagoguery, they
can end up like this:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcripts/3317_allfours.html
(also mirroring not the God Gene / curiosity science gene being the
same,as Frederick understood in Prussia, but the religion as division
and self-adulationfor the rulers of Turkey, until one Muslim nation
chose the dual curiosity and
embraced Kemal Ataturk.
-- we’re seemingly notto understand that despite our limitations to
specific language-bound images, these representreal aspects of
information, which may actually be transformational.
Of course, Mohammed’s a bit more tangible, having been actually
educated by a woman,who would become his wife, prior to
his preaching equality.
Here’s what demonizing gays encouraged in the West:
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(--fair use--academic--bare bone essentials--)
(undoubtedly the gene source is clueless, often
http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2010/jul/22/late-blooming-lesbians-women-sexuality )
That prior to the discovery statistically of the much
journalistically shunned --for the same reason you don’t know
this is likely illegal today:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UephHvStdWw
--gay gene, at the NIH, it had been thought that some male
homosexuality was caused by “man-hating mother,” (see the link at
bild, above, being mindful of the original Peter Pan syndrome,)
is not necessarily totally supplanted by the genetic finding and the
now overwhelming full history-moving proof, especially in our own time.
Who’s Mr. Birthright denier next? The milestones, Hitler’s femininity,
JFK’s assassins, the really socio-pathic typesfrom the religious
right who’ve proved being gay gay-bashers, likely suffered from that childhood.
This is freshly posted 5/29/2012
I aim to make this website 100% positive.
I've a job/family, everything taking some time.
Ultimately I'll have "affect proved--how," with links for
those interested.)
5/31/2012: would've been done already but I need a device
over which I can reliably retain control.
Then, it will be Nostradamus and my own curiosity as
to our commonly confused intermingling of inextricably
linked esoterica and tangible evidence.
I think Nostradamus understood that question while
wrestling with his own actual ability to see into
the "future" in "real time."
My theory counts in "conveyance (closely related
"aliens," who, are intensely simultaneously invested]
in history, science, and morality.) They want us
to understand, I think, the two define our universe, except,
that: information actually can enjoy different types of
life.
I think David Wu referred to “false Klingons” and had a over-excited
skirt chasing problem
(AS REPORTED--BY MY MEMORY ONLY--NOTHING AS TO
HIS PSYCHE OR EVENTS KNOWN TO MYSELF)
because he had a loving mother, so he appreciates women pretty much
across the board, with the “false Klingons”bit referring to the obnoxious
macho paranoid-like insulting, often threatening, clowns, from the religious
right of less recent years, who, he suspected, likely mostly accurately,
were themselves gay.
Or, even where not gay,they would be just obnoxious paranoia - rousers;
but, worse, they would be demonstrating their own arrested growth,
including the very king they would be teaching their sons.
Boys hurt animals, men don’t.
So men suffering from arrested growth will act like boys
where they need to assert gender. So their sons don’t watch football
Saturday , Sunday and Monday night. They watch one or other
sports game every night.
They tailgate and crash into families’ cars and destroy families.
But the source is obviously very substantially genetic.
It’s also apparent in population considerations. Asian men
eat plenty soy, don’t grow large breasts as one, I think culturally
influenced in his science, suggested should happen, and they of
course make plenty babies.
In fact much more, aside from the impact of China’s two-child
policy over the last generation.
Russia, perhaps with the most viciously anti-gay climate
from actually within a sitting “government,” is seeing its population collapse.
The world’s a perfect gradient in thatrespect but for one glaring exception.
Female subordination in Japan, I think, had been so thorough as to
have for the time being ushered in an understandable overreaction.
That pertains transference. Transference is first the guy who never got
recognition from a parent cause they resented their being where
they are by virtue of societal pressure, ordenied it to their children
because of their own need to pacify of because of their own ego defenses.
Transference for you is fear of the obnoxious prior. It’s everyone
insulting each other, or, at the very stupid least, judging each other from
the surface, never knowing the slightest thing about each other otherwise.
That one conflates such things as the arbitrary, paranoid “metrosexual”
with a pro-social outlook makes sense. Here’s demonizing and
associating with the demonized
http://www.pittsburghcitypaper.ws/pittsburgh/no-april-fools-joke-coulter-coming-to-pitt/Content?oid=133500
-_-
http://firedoglake.com/2010/10/15/sharron-angle-latest-tea-party-candidate-to-question-manhood-of-democratic-opponent/
-_-
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/14/jane-norton-ad-youd-think_n_646061.html
What is that but making pro - social individuals afraid of
being wrongly associated with a holocaust - targeted group
so that puppet masters can have a population target
people other than themselves?To call Lincoln “metrosexual”
is a total perplexer.Teddy Roosevelt (what do you think of him?) didn’t end
slavery with the bravery of Lincoln’s, which surelywas a million times larger than
must be yours, but he did enact the anti-trust laws.As soon as they
were buried the less obvious means of conducting slavery and the
more obvious destruction of
Roosevelt’s anti-trust work each sprang back to life.
But for the G-String, though, I’m guessing you would NOT
call this guy metrosexual:
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-01-14/entertainment/30008786_1_photos-g-string-gun-culture
or him that either:
http://www.biography.com/imported/images/Biography/Images/Profiles/H/J-Edgar-Hoover-9343398-1-402.jpg
But he certainly liked being a control freak.That’s judging for control.
That’s judging to demonize to associate with the demonized.
That’s to divide.
That’s to divide and conquer.
In “The Help,” Aibileen Clark (the help) teaches Skeater:
“You are kind,you are smart, you are important.”
Skeaters’ own parents
could not even know to do that. Until they transformed.
I think we’re witnessing some early signs of transformation
even on a physical level. It’s likely simple natural emergence
reflecting greater general awareness, as many of today’s tots are
anecdotally ahead of their ages as heretofore understood.
Our teachers only had these things to work with: tinkering with
genes; occassional nudging of history, I’m guessing, but it couldn’t
be too much lest we not learn the lesson; and time and
space, though for them time has all along been better understood
as point to point and is likely dramatically telescopable.
The places may have simply been this,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b8/Dome_of_the_Rock_03.jpg
now importantly reflecting its extensive, physical foundation,
with
similarities at Baalbek, Kalassaya, and elsewhere.
His idea.
http://faculty.maxwell.syr.edu/gaddis/hst210/sept9/Akhenaten%20bust.jpg
No human’s.
http://holygenes.weebly.com/
If I were a "practitioner" of anything bearing on
community economics or health, I would think to myself
the person advocating publicly the extinction of a people would be
naive as to the history of human moral curiosity.
He would be naive as to human history altogether.
He would be naive as to how those 2 things inform science.
I would remain aware that the 3 inform each other simultaneously.
That's not pandering to moralists while I openly have said I used
to be thoroughly atheist.
I theorize a conveyed lesson. I think it's a morality reflecting a
simultaneously generalized but also specific set of information
attributes that now bear on our unique opportunity to do what no
civilization prior to ours did, here on Earth.
Survive. Transform.
I don't know. Especially as to any person or their relations.
It could be strategy alone. It could be a desire to
imitate the extermination of gays prior to the extermination
of Jews at the outside of the Holocaust / Shoah.
But the person saying exterminate would be like the gays who
appeared as Hitler, JFK's fascist gay killers, and the particularly
nasty hypocritical champions of everything morally wrong
and scientifically naive. and historically naive.
I think the allegories pertaining ancient moral story is
purposely half esoteric, half historically verifiable. Oddly,
tellingly, both halves are true.
It's our own time that confirms my theory.
So, look for the person engaging in that.
Not to do anything but deny.
Ghandi preached denial of division.
He was a Buddha carbon copy.
He was thoroughly Confucianist.
He died like "Christ."
He believed in free, equal, love and,
I theorize, was brought to all that to
which all our moralities bring us.
Guess what. I know this .
Don't worry about the details.
John Lennon is likely blessed.
Study anything I've ever said, should you be interested.
I have never presumed judgement.
I've a soul mate I want forever.
It's a bit funky, but, I think this is also
my father wanting my mother forever.
(This will get deleted. I'm me'isms averse.)
John belongs with JFK / RFK / MLK.
Also others.
It's half esoteric, half tangible. I really don't know.
However, John is interesting.
Lennon / Lenin is confusing crony with Adam Smith
defrauded.
I do not believe "Lenin" was a tool.
He understood these things.
He was not crazy.
He said do not lose heart.
Do not resist.
Simply deny.
It takes a lot to reach this stage of hypocrisy:
Hitler was feminine.
He exterminated the gays.
He sought out a Jewish "prophet."
This website will not even link that person.
However, there are curious high frauds resonating, today.
Scapegoating, pacification, and arrogance are
defined by history, as are free, equal, love.
This website proposes Mark Twain was right.
That the Jewish nation's survival in exile for so
long is meaningful.
This websites says mechanical--deliberate.
There was tangibly, but also intermingled
with the esoteric discourse, the Babylonian exile,
which, tangibly, matters, and which scientists will
understand, but which this website will not
explore for fear of how people variously will take it as well
as because the potential impact after so many generations
is likely hardly material today.
This website has invested itself on the East page in
International Affairs.
This website theorizes we are now to understand we are
all vulnerable to transference, pacification and arrogance
and need to instead consider that traditional and more
open moralities are the same, and they suggest
free, equal and love mean survival.
Really, just a plus from our related teachers.
Very tellingly, the body language itself
(linking soon--literally, Ehud Barak desparately
man-handling Yassir Arafat into the meeting venue
at Camp David hosted by Mr. Clinton,) is confirming
this is partly about who gets more recognition.
Esoterically, Isaac and Ishmael have to know
free, equal and love.
Some Muslims need to exterminate.
Some Jews feel moral privilege from
history and apply that to self-adulation.
Many millions of people who have the ability
to control suffer from those things.
Trophy self-important people are presented aplenty,
exactly as in the manner of Jack Ruby.
The unsuspecting poor seeking hope and change
only solicit love.
The international affairs narrative is addressing arrogance
in Israel. History can make one feel morally
privileged. Our common history can bestow arrogance.
It does for most of us.
The economic follies of our time include multiple
formuli identifiable from history.
along economic, other scientific, and poor-morality
grounds.
Involving all peoples.
The need to scapegoat among many Muslims will
be up thereafter.
This is a common story.
The only thing that will prevent our frauds
from consuming our beloved Earth will
be the end of division.
Roosevelt understood slavery.
So he was anti-trust.
But he did not understand "no differences."
He supported division and the forces ending
the Boxer Rebellion, which rebellion resisted similar
means of compensation for the perennial increase in
inefficiency such as in our own (American) economic
institutions, caused by monopoly and corrupted
markets, ever impoverishing ever more of the population.
In THAT regard, Roosevelt is a match with
(L. Frank) Baum and (Gutzon) Borglum.
Roosevelt ended, only briefly, the part about: whatever
crime is good on my part is good for my country’s part.
But he still used division across borders.
That’s where Ghandi is different.
JFK, RFK and MLK were killed by those who want “whatever crime
is good on my part is good for my country’s part; and they actually
don’t care about division except they want you to only know
division.
Ghandi was free, equal, love.
He subjected himself to a globe of ridicule but was
not nuts.
He was a calm, abiding champion of
law and rights, both civil and birthright. His death marked the start
of a defining part of history which is our own.
How ironic Elizabeth Warren's detractors hail from near the site of
Brown v. Board of Educ.
I will here be connecting Dr. Kenneth Clark with Malcolm Gladwell.
I will not actually make assumptions as to the nature of information.
I simply ask questions and offer ideas.
I certainly will not judge. I offer impressions based on events.
Whomever judges you does so for control, or for pacification,
or for the need for self-adulation.
Stalin made a self-protective industry out of judging.
I propose that information can affect living humans
specially and across multiple persons.
I propose this was the case with JFK, RFK, MLK, whose
name is particularly intriguing, and certainly
would have been the case with Ghandi,
should this concept bear any validity.
6/5/2012:
The Way This Is Going To Work:
I'll Be Uniting (Soon) Math / Morality / History
With Current Events in a Manner Initially
Connecting Shakespeare's Curiosity.
Then, Some Time Soon (I Don't Know When,)
I'll Get To Query My Mother-In-Law, Unaware of
This (She's a Shakespearian.)
I'm Not A Shakespearian But Noticed The
Most Relevant Play Is Available Not Far
From Me.
Shakespeare matters as to fate vs. responsibility for actions.
Pascal pertains fair treatment of risk.
Nostradamus pertains both.
You confront chance. You make decisions.
You can have chance not affect you fairly because of
the control of others. You can have your rightful decisions
co-opted also because of the control of others.
I'm not about to tell you where chance stops and responsibility
starts, because I'm not the equal of Shakespeare, Nostradamus
or Pascal. However, you are not free. You are not equal.
The people responsible suffer very much from lack of love.
Baum, Borglum and Teddy Roosevelt believed in freedom.
They had to object to anything else. They were themselves,
and equality does not need to confront equality.
Ulysses S. Grant believed in freedom and also saw, like
Baum, Borglum and Roosevelt, diversity and something less
than equality.
Lincoln insisted on equality.
As did JFK / RFK / MLK.
Division killed Ghandi.
History places Lincoln - JFK-RFK-MLK - Ghandi in a special
place.
That is to say:
If, for instance, you make good decisions, your benefits
are essentially currently appropriated for the benefit of
an entrenched banking monopoly.
Your chance is treated as good for another monopoly
(health care,) bad for you.
It's your interaction with risk and your own actions, or
your own responsibility, that you are asked to deny for
yourself, such as where you are convinced you do not need
to worry about health coverage, and where you might sell
overpriced assets but then be forced to underwrite
those held by those in power.
That is everything describing your existence, apart from love.
That is freedom and equality, though in economic terms.
To put it another way again:
You don't have to worry about fate vs. responsibility.
Either way, you lose,
You need never utter "OMG."
It's irrelevant for you.
That's control. That's arrogance.
It's based on division, and sheer power.
I think bad people were foreseen. They're the
ones demonizing as they would be demonized, as
has been the example from early on.
There actually is no confusing of the subject.
The presumptions, the arbitrary perversions,
the hypocritical would-be exterminators, are all
proof.
Who could look more "masculine" than J. Edgar Hoover.
Indeed, the community demonizing gays and thus making people
afraid of being associated with the demonized would have
genetically favored presumed more-masculine looks; and,
concomitantly, those bearing those looks in those communities
are likelier to have had the gay gene passed on to them.
Potentially photo-shopped, and though I think a convicted felon,
what with my own being a risk-always-dashed lawyer I
won't provide a name outright, one famous anti-social actor
traditionally, typically followed on syndicated radio after
a pop-would-be-psych type who's a known gay-basher
is himself available on the internet with his quite macho body
adorned preposterously in American flag speedos.
Or the gay fascists who killed Kennedy.
Or those like them who appear later, convicted of thieir
control-related felonies, in revealing form.
What's it about the straight men, of all ages, from pre-teen
to 70, with children, attacked by those presuming them
being gay?
What is it but the self-limitations and paranoia of the
attackers? Or, so far, essentially 100% of the time,
their personal conflict?
They're far off from those like them who have
made history mastering fear.
What is it they need scapegoating for?
It's just resentment and profit?
Identical morality in the East. No arbitrary perversions.
No self-limitations. I actually had one grandfather who
was a boxer till he came to America and became a
self-educated, essentially intellectual success.
He would surely never have felt compelled to do a single
thing to prove his gender.
He was very profoundly compassionate. His wife, my
grandmother, was very much the same.
I actually have better. Something very borderline to
Mother Theresa. Hot in youth. 99% as much
so now.
Our world is now desparate to reclaim
free equal love from control.
It is Helen Keller.
It is Anne Frank.
It is Julius Fucik.
It is traditional morality, and it is Lincoln and
T. Roosevelt incomplete
as to himself.
Ghandi simply said:
Do not lose heart.
Do not resist.
Simply deny.
This page pertains all health / genetics / relations /
social sciences, with the word sciences
appropriate.
Possibililties / probabilities / risk.
Apportioning them while preserving competition
while also preserving rightful opportunity for
future life and risk is an extremely simple matter.
Without the opposite, the wealth is unimaginable.
Without the opposite, no one would eat anyone's
lunch. Only self-important people confined to
very narrow thinking can't see that.
It can never be a life, in a once-in-a-history
time that one controlling group,
because of their transference, pacification and
desparate lack of recognition, would send warriors
to compensate for folly, so as to control billions,
so as to kill and destroy otherwise so many
families. In the rest of the worls in this age of information
the rest of the world understands that for itself too.
But the control freaks, and the insulting arrogant persons,
be they in the West or in the East, are in the end not
the final issue.
We are confronted with a resident few bent on using
those facts for their unique need to control.
So one can understand the entrenched monopolies
by way of their
mirror image in self-adulance but also that elusive
controlling group.
I'm from Los Angeles. The obvious parallel: scientificos
supporting the hacendados.
So just what IS IT that's supposed to restore an economy
fairly but still protect an entrenched group of scapegoaters,
pacifiers and ego defenders?
Your answer is still better than simply making the
powerless pay for the worst imaginable, childish,
axe-grinding folly of those types.
But just as Marx confused cronyism with
fairly apportioned risk, you likely could do the same.
That's because the lifeline to the powerless from the
would-be titans of the Ivy League actually only differ
in their apologetics slightly. They're also not
adjusted to the information age.
The devices for control and feeding of a privilege can
simply by half-legal, half-controlled.
Then, they profit everyone, same as with any
other endeavor.
Time for another James Bond movie.
(The Spy Who Loved Me.)
The stereotype betrays:
We all adapt to fear and control
and denial of recognition.
Disdain the self-important who would let you suffer.
The ones who want to control you not for simple
transference, not for simple pacification, are
different. It takes much to be the would-be
murderers of the best Earth could produce
who would be like God.
I can barely do this.
I'm a lawyer.
My soul mate is entirely Mother Theresa - like. Actually,
much like her mother.
However, she adds many more dimensions.
I happen to be straight.
I happen to be aware of denial of birthright and affiliation
with the demonized
so designated for extermination.
I'm trained in law. Also: economics. Also: health matters.
The economics part involves, since the time of my own
graduation from
college, much to do about probabilities.
You know it as Taleb -- possibilities.
I will be dealing with that.
My personal probabilities are kinda' / sorta' mathematically
testing my ability to not surrender to this process.
I'm venturing into the area of "do not be afraid."
I'm personally registered at numerous places, dealing ad infinitum
with ID-confirmations--
-----------
Place for analysis intentionally left open here.
-------------
, also ad infinitum those who do not want to
hear about control, associating with the demonized.
My theory says infinite variation / infinite growth / emergence /
ever-so-lucky relation / conveyed message as to science,
morality and history. I'm not shabby stuff. I think this matters.
To actually be able to travel to the stars is high in the
universe's evolutionary chain. I have been reverse engineering
from proofs of relation and original information for a long time.
Just who controls the money and decision making when it comes to
Star Trek Generations, huh?
That's: archaeology Mayan kings waiting to get taken to space.
That's: Ron Howard's Cocoon.
When I go to my local swimming hole, I escape from the
transference, pacification, ego defense.
My wife is potentially the world's greatest missionary.
I'm a lawyer working on making this entirely me not involving family.
This website has long ago fallen on free - equal - love.
- and - Do Not Be Afraid.
At this stage, I fully trust, actually, you can separate
myself from my own family.
However, the many elements of my family is stuff.
Make a choice, will ya?
--Shoot me.
--Take stuff I've offered.
(Not quite what you're thinking. My family
actually is history's most mixed, and
history's most capable.)
It's my own site which will be what offers what I have to offer.
My website explains everything.
However, I actually have had conundrums put to me.
"Counterfactuals."
This is math / Shakespeare.
Which is why, I will be travelling South once again.
Catch me if you can.
It will be a theatre and a dinner, if you catch me.
COMING HERE NOTWITHSTANDING THE ME:
THE HALF - PETTY OBJECTIONS, HALF - MIRROR
IMAGE IMPORTANT FROM THAT VERY SAME
SOURCE: ELIZABETH WARREN.
which includes narrative censored.
THE PRIMARY MESSAGE,
AVAILABLE AT HUFFINGTONPOST
UNDER MY PEN NAME THERE
"LOUIS JOURDIN,"
IS AS TO MUCH DEFINING U.S. HISTORY AND
ITS CITIZENS' SEARCH FOR BIRTHRIGHT AND
TELLING OF HISTORY.
I'VE BEEN CENSORED BY THE VERY PEOPLE
WHO'SE PERSONAL PURPOSE OF BEING
IS NULLIFIED BY THE VERY PROCESS THEY
CENSOR.
I WILL GATHER MYSELF, PLACE THIS IN TERMS OF
YOURSELF, MY-SELF, AND OUR SKIPPING
PAST THOSE WHO WOULD GAME OUR KNOWLEDGE,
OUR PLANET.
MAY YOU ASSOCIATE MYSELF WITH ANY
DEMONIZED GROUP.
I HAVE BEEN TOLERATED.
I'VE A SOUL MATE.
SHE HAS ACTUALLY SPECIFICALLY
BEEN IN CONSULTATION WITH FULLY
TRAINED PROFESSIONALS MORALLY.
HOWEVER, THEY ARE APPARENTLY EXPECTING
SOMETHING FROM US.
I BRING EVERY REASON PERTAINING HISTORY
CO-OPTED.
I BRING EVERY REASON WHY ESOTERICA AND TANGIBLE
HISTORY ARE ODDLY INTER-MIXED.
THAT'S ACTUALLY WHERE I STOP.
MY SOUL MATE HAS HANDED ME:
SHAKESPEARE.
WHAT MATTERS.
MY SOUL MATE IS YOUR CANDIDATE FOR
TRANSFORMATION.
Conflation of Good Morality With Anti-Social Behavior,
The Theft of The Freedom Sought By Lincoln and the
Equality Sought By Teddy Roosevelt, the False/Wrong
Understanding of Responsibility, as Understood by
Shakespeare, Nostradamus and Pascal, and the Cheating
on Fate (Good for the Control Freaks and the Arrogant Types,
Bad for Everyone Else,)
Is Explained Here, But Your're Unlikely
To Find the Comment There, So It's Here:
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
I can certainly understand male self-absorption.
I think our economy and democracy
are at risk essentilly because of billionaires essentially mstrbtg
their egos on people--literally like a rape.
When process self-produced hypocritical masters of fear
can conflate demonizing for the sake of being afraid of being
demonized, they then can conflate anti-social behavior
with moral good.
EXAMPLE 1
EXAMPLE 2
EXAMPLE 3
Billionaires must love that, and many are likely personally
connected with the aforesaid hypocrites. Otherwise, why
would some of them perform in male-only plays in the woods
with no women allowed?
The ill-placement of a few parents induces the culture of
pacification (mollification) as well, and ego defense (arrogance.)
It’s a giant mistake for a woman to engage in transference.
Men do it to, insulting each other in one manner or another all day long.
First, transference is the aforesaid hypocrites transfering fear and
wrongful childhood denials, knowing they’re the objects of it and then
mastering it. Then, TO YOU: IT’S FEARING ANYONE
RESEMBLING THE OBNOXIOUS PRIOR. Gee, that most likely
pertains the majority of men you encounter (both: obnoxious;
the look-alikes.)
I’ve proposed (pertinent link at bottom) a proving in morality
(and science/history) based on this “accident” based on a
gradient assuming the East is but for this actually morally identical.
Though the would-be demonized ordinarily provide numerical
genetic advantage to the group, history has proven a science
wherein we know these hypocrites must have been processed-self-produced,
because they’re virtually always the match with what they demonize.
It also proves the morality and the history, and THEY
appear having been foreseen.
Your men can be helped, if you’re interested, I happen to
think and obviously offer.
Many people enjoy the ability to control--to judge, to control,
to scapegoat. Most don’t understand the obnoxious
person is the loser in the first place, so many prefer remaining
obnoxious.
I try to stick with words with content--a guard against ranting,
though the history-proved stuff
is unavoidable in terms of how this comment comes about.
What about the natural desire for a strong guy?
Lincoln, JFK, RFK, MLK were all intensely
strong and courageous.
They didn’t outwardly try to project that.
Boys hurt animals. Men don’t.
But men will if they have to assert gender
to prove gender.
That’s arrested growth.
Whether J. Edgar Hoover
was gay or not, he looked tough and indeed surely was.
What would you say about this guy:
conflating anti-social behavior with manhood perhaps?
self-unaware of something perhaps?
But, he actually does look tough.
THE ROBOT IS FLAWLESS.
YOU HAVE MANY FLAWS.
NOW THIS IS REALLY IMPORTANT:
SOUL MATES ARE FAULTLESS.
This is an essential influence from Star Trek.
If you scapegoat for an error 6 years ago, and then also
1 day ago: You are the exact opposite of Cmdr Data.
He was a robot who wanted to be human.
You're by that a human who wants to be a robot.
I will be absent briefly toward the end of June from
updating this website. I will be visiting my mother-in-law.
She's unaware of this site as far as I know.
She's a well qualified Shakespearian.
I will be actually seeing a sort of local performance of
a particular play and asking her as to her idea of the
significance of that particular play.
Simply copy-pasted from the preceding site,
this is where the following occurred.
HOW G-D SAVES SOULS, DRAWING ON
GARRETT LISI'S THEORY OF EVERYTHING,
MIRROR NEURONS, AND MY EXPERIENCE HELPING
MY MOTHER-IN-LAW WITH PUZZLES
Not new:
Cosmology is a puzzle. Physicists have been
saying that all along.
New:
Puzzles have outlying cardboard borders.
The Proposal:
Not New:
The universe may be a computer .
New:
Garrett Lisi's E8 matrix presents the opportunity to
package coherent energy
matrices in any size, in multiple dimensions.
A Universal Containment Force or Particle affords the
quarantining of such
coherent energy matrices for preservation.
Think: the reverse of an anti-viral program quarantining
a computer virus; rather,
a containment energy preserving consciousness.
The coherent energy matrices can interrelate
with each other
just as files on a computer get rearranged for greater
efficiency in the defragmentation process.
(My mother-in-law does puzzles. I noticed they ultimately
have simple cardboard borders. Though I most
definitely will be doing puzzles, I will be curious as
to Shakespeare. There might be a play nearby we
can all enjoy too. She's relocated more exactly in
PA's SE corner, but she had been between Gettysburg
and Valley Forge, which places I visited.)
'Till travel time, I'll reverse engineer prioritize:
1:
Nostradamus' Apparent Code
On the predecessor site I dabbled with
what to say to control freaks.
I'm a lawyer. Actually giving specifics could never happen.
2:
Simply never forget:
THE OBNOXIOUS PERSON IS THE LOSER ON ARRIVAL
(AS IN LOA AS IN DOA AS IN DEAD ON ARRIVAL.)
I can do something almost as useful to those reading this:
3:
WHY A CONTROL FREAK--THE MANY APPLICATIONS:
(I Don't Presume Knowing More Than My Slice Of Insight.
These Will Reflect Transference, Pacification, Ego Defense)
4:
A Set of Hypotheticals
(Imagining Whatever It Might Be
You (and I ) Might Expect From The Future)
(I have mine. I think our history is now meant
to be understood. I think divisions are at an end.
I think all ego defenses, all parochialisms have to
end. I think transference and pacification are transparent.
However, I think each lot of us brings understanding
morally.
Your moral leaders have become aligned long, long ago.
They each, to my view, will remain important--
as I'm guessing.
I'm guessing everyone believes in the exact
same thing. I don't think anyone should
take lightly anyone's slice of history.
However, as to the Nostradamus part, there
are, beyond the Code itself, and the Code's
connection of event streams, morality and math,
the question of identification--the question of
fraud or resident evil.
Nothing would make me happier than to
see a bringer of the end of division and the
bringer of love.
I cannot answer to what extent someone is
not that.
Resident evil implies resident good.
One transformational bad implies
a transformational good.
I suspect fraud, but I do not know its nature.
It pretends much, but it enjoys this.
For everyone.
The Nazi's attacked gays, the emotionally
infirm (which should have included themselves,)
Jews, and variously arbitrarily whomever wasn't
just like the person doing the control freak act.
It does this while pretending to end
transference of fear.
Now we are to be like Ghandi denying
the masters of fear, the pacifiers, the
ego defenders who might as well be
Jack Ruby.
The purpose of aligning with it does not exist
for there can not be a chosen purpose of
revealing history when history is told.
The arrogant person acting in defense of the
control of birthright is no less the fascist.
The purpose of this is the end of history,
the discovery of science, morality
and event streams,
and the return of brotherhood.
I'm personally convinced our own time is foreseen and
foretold. I have no idea as to reflections from 2000
years ago. I think they're a mix bag of interaction--
history-nudging, science/morality/event stream understanding
imparted; but, I actually really do wonder about
a more generalized living information playing a role.
I will have time before my trip to site astro-physicists
corroborative of that. They may deem me nuts.
I don't deem them nuts, though others would.
We're obviously all simply dead absent a change.
Education as to division trumping caring for
each other is the first thing that comes to mind.
That defines turning swords into plowshares.
The entrenched, defended monopolies absolutely
live in their Alice in Wonderland self-importance,
a combination of transference, arrogance,
self-deception, the transference as to
your own responsibility and your own awareness
of chance remarkably separated from yourselves.
This is about division and demonizing.
Those who need demons so as to demonize never
were your God.
The foreseen demons are in our time.
I really don't know if this is a foreknowledge from
teachers as to what to recognize or more than that.
I think that. I think it reflects our related teachers'
understanding of information.
I think they believe love lives.
That defines our universe.
It defines our events.
That defines how your children
will travel to the stars.
I consider Napoleon "milestone information" mainly
because of highly likely Nostradamus reference.
I consider him to have been less telling than Hitler.
However, as there are those who would repeat the steps of Hitler,
starting with the gays, we can today understand prophesy
as referring to our time. We can see the scapegoated not
understanding their need to trust and floundering between vulnerability
and willingness to scapegoat or to simply fend for their personal validation.
Napoleon was supposed to be democratic but was not.
He was a warmonger also.
Yet, he actually believed in equality, particularly in access to
higher degrees of education.
That's actually two steps removed from worse than one can know:
pretending to support that, yet taking delight
in the pretense.
As this website presents a theory in science, morality and
history that also presents our own time as being
very telling, I'm going to link an outreach comment as to the
would-be new murderers in Europe, who would
murder the gays, making use of the new imitators in Africa,
and, extracting from that, simple humble ideas
that may be of value in two specific fields:
international relations
morality, but morality informed by science
and history, with suggested thoughts as to how morality
also informs science and history.
I'll then start citing brave fully qualified (a) scientist(s) who've
lately started a discourse as to reasons to question
why we might be in a point in time and space that
is particularly telling.
It's within that where I'll add that: I would theorize
our teachers of morality, history and science
chose this to be a telling time for us to choose
self-adulation and a world be damned or an
understanding of that lesson for reasons
beyond simple whim, beyond some simple
imaginable limit of patience.
We might very well be at a point where information
is more transformative.
I personally don't expect events as one might
see at the ending of "Ghostbusters."
However, I am theorizing we've been in a lesson for the
sake of understanding the nature of history, science and
morality, and, that freedom, equality and love are
necessary elements for communities to cooperate,
survive and transform, whereas division and judging
and scapegoating are paths to failure--and, that
freedom, equality and love are aspects of nature
that actually live.
Curious Christians might simple imagine
achieving those things would then feel
very much like a birth, and as
the entire world would know
freedom, equality and love, who
knows, it just might be one.
because of highly likely Nostradamus reference.
I consider him to have been less telling than Hitler.
However, as there are those who would repeat the steps of Hitler,
starting with the gays, we can today understand prophesy
as referring to our time. We can see the scapegoated not
understanding their need to trust and floundering between vulnerability
and willingness to scapegoat or to simply fend for their personal validation.
Napoleon was supposed to be democratic but was not.
He was a warmonger also.
Yet, he actually believed in equality, particularly in access to
higher degrees of education.
That's actually two steps removed from worse than one can know:
pretending to support that, yet taking delight
in the pretense.
As this website presents a theory in science, morality and
history that also presents our own time as being
very telling, I'm going to link an outreach comment as to the
would-be new murderers in Europe, who would
murder the gays, making use of the new imitators in Africa,
and, extracting from that, simple humble ideas
that may be of value in two specific fields:
international relations
morality, but morality informed by science
and history, with suggested thoughts as to how morality
also informs science and history.
I'll then start citing brave fully qualified (a) scientist(s) who've
lately started a discourse as to reasons to question
why we might be in a point in time and space that
is particularly telling.
It's within that where I'll add that: I would theorize
our teachers of morality, history and science
chose this to be a telling time for us to choose
self-adulation and a world be damned or an
understanding of that lesson for reasons
beyond simple whim, beyond some simple
imaginable limit of patience.
We might very well be at a point where information
is more transformative.
I personally don't expect events as one might
see at the ending of "Ghostbusters."
However, I am theorizing we've been in a lesson for the
sake of understanding the nature of history, science and
morality, and, that freedom, equality and love are
necessary elements for communities to cooperate,
survive and transform, whereas division and judging
and scapegoating are paths to failure--and, that
freedom, equality and love are aspects of nature
that actually live.
Curious Christians might simple imagine
achieving those things would then feel
very much like a birth, and as
the entire world would know
freedom, equality and love, who
knows, it just might be one.
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
I'm beginning to unify all this. I'll be adding to
every element, including the curiosities on the
Science page, but I'll near term be trying to validate
the ideas as to the Code of Nostradamus
and its relation to Blaise Pascal's inspiration.
I'll combine that with our history, the identical
underpinning of all Earth's moralities, the confirmations
as to judging to control, which affects all relations large,
small, individual, national, the specific
curiosities raised here stemming
from Nostradamus' apparent achievements, our
history in relation to the likelihood of
related "others" being our teachers, and
additionally, particularly, the idea that ancient
writing bears on our time particularly because now we
can identify the frauds in judging and slave-making, the
hypocrites, not any living being that
otherwise one might elect to demonize.
Add, now importantly: our "point location" may
be an element in our teachers choice
of "time" for our passing or not passing the test
in science, morality and history proposed.
I propose we are supposed to feel something
feel-able at this point upon achieving
freedom, equality and love.
My theory is only "revelation-" related by
force of meaning--happenstance.
It is not apocalyptic because I'm (reasonably
informed-) optimistic as to our ability
to pass the proposed test.
Why would our teachers subject so many
of us to so much trepidation?
I have not answer contrived to suit any part of
this theory. And I don't know as to
that. However, I can imagine this brings us
up to speed as to their understanding, and
THEY still feel moral challenge.
This is why this theory and website are entirely
well aligned with every reader's
existing moral underpinning and teachers.
It is because I theorize a choice of futures that
after I post here what I've posted
elsewhere, but which can be difficult to find,
that on the East page, which is
partly concerning world affairs, I will be making,
however outlandish the appearance,
an appeal to the Ultra Orthodox influencing
affairs in Israel, whose critical and
and fragile vulnerabilities I acknowledge,
that they consider with their Jewish
counterparts in and outside Israel, of all
degrees of orthodoxy, and with leaders
of the other faiths, that this is indeed a
revelational time but that they do not
have to see our world end.
As some readers will know, there
not long ago were those from among
the Israeli Orthodoxy who went so
far as to proclaim non-Israeli Jews
"not Jewish."
As regards this my theory, though my childhood
family lacked a religious tradition, I have to say
that is so obviously wrong that it creates the
one essential item required enabling one of
Earth's most fundamentalist groups to understand
their understanding exists with attachment to
everyone else's. All groups' histories are
events constituting event streams in fact.
None can not count outside a vacuum.
There cannot be a vacuum.
That cannot be a correct assumption on their
part based on my theory's proposed discovery
of a precluding, frankly conflicting, pair of facts.
Revelation through history (originating Jewish,
common to the Abrahamic systems.)
This is the very purpose of self-purpose and
returning to Jerusalem.
Jewish is Jewish mother.
The Orthodox can proclaim not Jewish still
to the Jewish Diaspora, but that would
rule out essential links to the very people
in Israel making that claim.
(NOTE: That claim never amounted to
anything within the Jewish community, but,
it serves well, partly, in explaining this theory.)
This provides a basis for a proof of relation.
It provides a basis for a proof of an actual
meta-experiment (the Lost Tribe of Israel,
which I'm guessing is increasingly amply
confirmed being the Kaifeng Jews.)
It's simultaneously a proof of event streams
and morality, which, as events transpire,
should be increasingly understandable as being
one and the same with math. The very act of
successfully completing the lesson and test in morality
(and history and science) itself is a culminating proof.
The icing on the cake is simply an unavoidable guess.
I originated this process because of a personal
resentment of forces insisting on judging for the
personal obnoxious need for control.
I landed, logically for myself, in an apparent possible
simultaneous proving in science, morality and history.
Trust me I understand histrionics.
I understand mind tricks.
There is not, and never has been,
the slightest bit of either.
From my own limited sense of
Egyptian and Greek input,
with / without consideration
of
this guy,
I think that attitude is correct as to
every faith's role in history's
being telling, but not compatible
with a more reasonable idea as
to history's possible paths.
I think a proof of relation will
show a bridge from within
our earlier evolutionary course.
I think it is readily understandable
how it is this history had to survive
to this point.
Now, I get personal.
I come from what is potentially
history's most mixed family
(quite extensive.)
I cannot put words in other's'
mouths. The internet makes
that dangerously simple to do,
but I know not to do that.
We all love each other.
We only know free-equal-love.
I will be combining that with new, purely
"scientific" insights that most
interestingly are possible just now by
virtue of our locational "point,"
the just-now front edge of science's
ability to offer these insights, and
the just-now availability of those most
talented scientists who are
able to offer these insights.
As I just indicated in the preceding
section, perhaps this "point-location"
affords information additional
opportunity to enjoy additional
stages of life, including by means
of processes such as what
are theorized in this website.
I'll be repeating in the unified
story new ways of comparing
robots with ourselves.
From what I placed at care2.com soon:
This is only to the best of my own
ability and understanding.
Do Not Be Afraid of Your Own Shadow.
Do Not Care;
The Person Pacifiying, The Person Knowing
Control From Fear Known. The Ego Defender.
Do Not Fear Your Curiosity.
You Are Brief. You May Be Forever.
You Are Blessed Able To Transform From Curiosity.
You Are Rare. You Are Unique.
You Are Birthright.
You Will Not Judge.
That Makes Very Few Of Us.
I Don't Happen To See This As Our Arc,
Though Those Passing This Test Are
Few.
However, It Matters Somehow.
I REALLY DO Think You Have
Something That Can Live Forever.
Though I Have Been Reverse Engineering From
That And Travel To The Stars For a Long Time
I Am With Yourselves Only Lately More
Encouraged.
As I Think This Is About A Conveyed Lesson In History,
Morality and Math, I Am Hoping I Don't Have To
Pass Through A Test Of Challenge / Faith.
However, Nothing Is Going To Change My World.
My Birthright.
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
ALSO NOW AVAILABLE
THIS only contains half the intended
message, the rest below,
which I'll in turn link at the other.
THAT HITLER WAS FEMININE, JFK'S KILLERS WERE
SUBSTANTIALLY GAY FASCISTS, AND VIRTUALLY ALL
MURDERERS OF GAYS HAVE BEEN SELF UNAWARE,
CONFLICTED GAYS, PROVES A PROPHESY THAT IS
SIMPLY VERY PRACTICAL IN ADVANCING A TELLING
IN SCIENCE, MORALITY AND HISTORY.
IT PROVES THAT SCIENCE, MORALITY AND HISTORY,
RATHER THAN DISPROVE A MORALITY.
IT IS THESE HYPOCRITES THAT DEFINE THE
WHOLE OF THE FEAR AND TURNING AGENT
OF HISTORY, A MEANS FOR THEM TO HAVE
CONTAINED A PEOPLE IN A TIGHTLY CONTROLLED
BOX.
People judge to control. It can be a would-be
pop-psychologist on the radio.
It can be a family member. It can be a cop.
The purpose for the actor is (I think, generally) transference
(knowing fear from one's own
experience and mastering it for personal advantage,) pacification
(mollification/compensation,)
and ego defense (arrogance.) Multiple purposes go
aplenty for some actors.
Once demonized, it becomes possible to
associate with the demonized.
Only men counted for power until recent generations,
so demonizing gays has mostly
meant making straight guys afraid of being
wrongly ferreted out as gay.
Creating false demons clears the field for one's own folly.
One can demonize immigrants while denying one's
listeners a voice for water rights,
in favor of, say, an out-of-state brewer, hypothetically.
Divide and conquer serves any purpose one can imagine,
including enslaving one's "own."
Though we know from "developmental" work
that simple uteral events serve to optimize
the incidence of homosexuality (likely long
before the 2% of human history when records
were written) for the numerical genetic
advantage of the group, we actually know it's
also genetic not simply from this:
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(--fair use--academic--bare bone essentials--)
but because of the exquisitely perfect
gradient of virtually every murderer of gays having
been proven gay, including where the victim(s) have
proven not being gay. Also, Hitler was famously feminine.
JFK’s killers were substantially gay fascists.
It’s the rare religious right gay basher who hasn’t turned out
being gay or having a child who has come out.
It’s only the hypocritical ones who may have
actually been foretold. By someone.
The East, I theorize, though not coming
from any background but the thoroughly skeptical
agnostic one, which in fact is morally identical
to ours, upon new, and close inspection.
Except for this.
In the West, royals assume names appropriate for
their regional assignment,
the exact opposite of Divide and Conquer.
In the East, it’s just emporers.
So it sure as heck looks like something that might as
well be a meta-experiment along event streams.
And it sure as heck seems to prove, not disprove,
simultaneously, a science, a morality, and a history.
So a morality is PROVED, not disproved.
Simultaneously with a science and history, the three,
I theorize, being one and the same.
It's why those most hostile to gays are likeliest
sources of the gay gene themselves.
It's why the East, theorized by me being otherwise morally
identical has much less homosexuality, and it's why the
hostility in Uganda and other parts of Africa provide
a living gradient with the children of many / most
murderous preachers coming out, and with Russia, arguably
the most developed Western nation being hostile toward
gays quasi-officially, having a population crisis.
(DISCLAIMER: I CANNOT KNOW ANYTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT
ANYONE POTENTIALLY OR ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED HERE, OR, ABOUT
ANY OF THEIR RELATIONS. IN FURTHERANCE OF THIS DISCLAIMER:
THE PROCESS IDENTIFIED SPECIFIES A PARTICULAR STRATEGY TO
WHICH ANY ONLOOKER CAN SUBSCRIBE CYNICALLY, REGARDLESS OF
THEIR BIOLOGICAL OR EMOTIONAL PREDILECTIONS.)
It will be those most presumed and thus favored by the scapegoaters as
least gay-looking who will be gay because of their favor.
The most famous gay fascists in U.S. history
have all looked particularly masculine.
What might one think about this guy on any of those scores?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-01-14/entertainment/30008786_1_photos-g-string-gun-culture#comment-4d30ae2f49e2ae1718010000
On conflating anti-social behavior with good morality:
http://holygenes.weebly.com/social.html#alldefiningbirthrightstolen
Not to minimize the most recent holocaust, which I refer to as
"informationally milestone," but one need only deny birthright to be
guilty of its basic evil, at least according to this guy:
http://pages.citebite.com/g2a2d0expuk
I think it's a conveyed lesson and test in understanding morality,
math and history are one and the same; it's how to travel
to the stars; it's a means of understanding
ourselves and original information, and I think it may
be happening at this point(used instead of time/place (distance)
because upon seeing the very math of
free, equal, happy, which, upon very close examination
you will find defines every moral underpinning, may here and
now be exerting themselves as stages of living information.
This is one esoteric theory why the moral leaders
of the world should explain the role of choosing cooperation
and peace instead of division and war.
History, math and morality prove choosing cooperation
and peace instead of division and war in any event.
One need not know the nature of the great uniters of the
great cultures of our common past.
And more specifically, in light of the sad events
involving the Ethiopian Jews, the discernible and
plainly understandable points of vulnerability sensed
by the Jewish Israelis should perhaps be addressed
by the Muslims and the world, and the Chief Rabbinate in
Israel should consider with tolerance our common sense from our
common God gene, which I think is the same
thing as our curiosity-science gene.
I THINK IT WAS IMPLANTED.
They and their new friends from recent decades,
most leaders of the other faiths, should
consider the historical evidence as a whole in much
the manner as would the student of
the web bot, of digital forensics, etc.
I've personally theorized the existence of a
mathematical construct linking event streams with math--
specifically, that Blaise Pascal added Nostradamus'
insights to Yang Hui's choices-over-time triangle.
I think it's a conveyed lesson. I think the idea we
have to perish is at best half right.
I think we can pass the test and see our
children travel to the stars.
If these guesses hold any validity, then history turns
when scapegoating and arrogance end. Morality may indeed
need explaining in this light by the moral leaders referenced,
and for a long time to come. But the end of divide
and conquer, starting with the
religions and the gays, means the end of parochialism.
The obnoxious person is the loser. LOA. Loser On Arrival.
Just like DOA, Dead On Arrival.
If you are reading this you're likely the rare curious one
actually curious about my curiosity, as this indeed has been
the latest growth point of the theory.
I certainly appreciate your interest, though I'm really
simply pursuing my own curiosity while also objecting
to judging for control.
Prior to a brief trip late June / early July I hope to
do Gladwell / Kenneth Clark and
more on the Nostradamus / Pascal link.
I'm right here connecting my theory with the latest from
Hoagland.
Though he may consider me a kook, and though many of
his colleagues likely regard him as being out in left field,
I consider him a scientist's scientist, and I simply will
pursue my curiosity w/o concern for approval.
I AM SOON INSTALLING A MAJOR RE-WRITE
ON THE HOME PAGE SO AS TO BETTER PRESENT
WHAT'S NOW A MORE SHARPLY DEFINED THEORY,
THOUGH ALSO PRESENTING THE MANY, MANY
ELEMENTS IMPACTING IT, THOUGH I ALSO FIRMLY
THINK THE MANY SUB-THEORIES CAN IN EACH
CASE POTENTIALLY LIVE ON ITS OWN.
HOWEVER, THIS SEEMS TO BE GETTING
MORE SENSE-MAKING ALL THE TIME.
ALSO NOW AVAILABLE
THIS only contains half the intended
message, the rest below,
which I'll in turn link at the other.
THAT HITLER WAS FEMININE, JFK'S KILLERS WERE
SUBSTANTIALLY GAY FASCISTS, AND VIRTUALLY ALL
MURDERERS OF GAYS HAVE BEEN SELF UNAWARE,
CONFLICTED GAYS, PROVES A PROPHESY THAT IS
SIMPLY VERY PRACTICAL IN ADVANCING A TELLING
IN SCIENCE, MORALITY AND HISTORY.
IT PROVES THAT SCIENCE, MORALITY AND HISTORY,
RATHER THAN DISPROVE A MORALITY.
IT IS THESE HYPOCRITES THAT DEFINE THE
WHOLE OF THE FEAR AND TURNING AGENT
OF HISTORY, A MEANS FOR THEM TO HAVE
CONTAINED A PEOPLE IN A TIGHTLY CONTROLLED
BOX.
People judge to control. It can be a would-be
pop-psychologist on the radio.
It can be a family member. It can be a cop.
The purpose for the actor is (I think, generally) transference
(knowing fear from one's own
experience and mastering it for personal advantage,) pacification
(mollification/compensation,)
and ego defense (arrogance.) Multiple purposes go
aplenty for some actors.
Once demonized, it becomes possible to
associate with the demonized.
Only men counted for power until recent generations,
so demonizing gays has mostly
meant making straight guys afraid of being
wrongly ferreted out as gay.
Creating false demons clears the field for one's own folly.
One can demonize immigrants while denying one's
listeners a voice for water rights,
in favor of, say, an out-of-state brewer, hypothetically.
Divide and conquer serves any purpose one can imagine,
including enslaving one's "own."
Though we know from "developmental" work
that simple uteral events serve to optimize
the incidence of homosexuality (likely long
before the 2% of human history when records
were written) for the numerical genetic
advantage of the group, we actually know it's
also genetic not simply from this:
http://www.bild.me/bild.php?file=3016012img069.jpg
(--fair use--academic--bare bone essentials--)
but because of the exquisitely perfect
gradient of virtually every murderer of gays having
been proven gay, including where the victim(s) have
proven not being gay. Also, Hitler was famously feminine.
JFK’s killers were substantially gay fascists.
It’s the rare religious right gay basher who hasn’t turned out
being gay or having a child who has come out.
It’s only the hypocritical ones who may have
actually been foretold. By someone.
The East, I theorize, though not coming
from any background but the thoroughly skeptical
agnostic one, which in fact is morally identical
to ours, upon new, and close inspection.
Except for this.
In the West, royals assume names appropriate for
their regional assignment,
the exact opposite of Divide and Conquer.
In the East, it’s just emporers.
So it sure as heck looks like something that might as
well be a meta-experiment along event streams.
And it sure as heck seems to prove, not disprove,
simultaneously, a science, a morality, and a history.
So a morality is PROVED, not disproved.
Simultaneously with a science and history, the three,
I theorize, being one and the same.
It's why those most hostile to gays are likeliest
sources of the gay gene themselves.
It's why the East, theorized by me being otherwise morally
identical has much less homosexuality, and it's why the
hostility in Uganda and other parts of Africa provide
a living gradient with the children of many / most
murderous preachers coming out, and with Russia, arguably
the most developed Western nation being hostile toward
gays quasi-officially, having a population crisis.
(DISCLAIMER: I CANNOT KNOW ANYTHING WHATSOEVER ABOUT
ANYONE POTENTIALLY OR ACTUALLY IDENTIFIED HERE, OR, ABOUT
ANY OF THEIR RELATIONS. IN FURTHERANCE OF THIS DISCLAIMER:
THE PROCESS IDENTIFIED SPECIFIES A PARTICULAR STRATEGY TO
WHICH ANY ONLOOKER CAN SUBSCRIBE CYNICALLY, REGARDLESS OF
THEIR BIOLOGICAL OR EMOTIONAL PREDILECTIONS.)
It will be those most presumed and thus favored by the scapegoaters as
least gay-looking who will be gay because of their favor.
The most famous gay fascists in U.S. history
have all looked particularly masculine.
What might one think about this guy on any of those scores?
http://articles.businessinsider.com/2011-01-14/entertainment/30008786_1_photos-g-string-gun-culture#comment-4d30ae2f49e2ae1718010000
On conflating anti-social behavior with good morality:
http://holygenes.weebly.com/social.html#alldefiningbirthrightstolen
Not to minimize the most recent holocaust, which I refer to as
"informationally milestone," but one need only deny birthright to be
guilty of its basic evil, at least according to this guy:
http://pages.citebite.com/g2a2d0expuk
I think it's a conveyed lesson and test in understanding morality,
math and history are one and the same; it's how to travel
to the stars; it's a means of understanding
ourselves and original information, and I think it may
be happening at this point(used instead of time/place (distance)
because upon seeing the very math of
free, equal, happy, which, upon very close examination
you will find defines every moral underpinning, may here and
now be exerting themselves as stages of living information.
This is one esoteric theory why the moral leaders
of the world should explain the role of choosing cooperation
and peace instead of division and war.
History, math and morality prove choosing cooperation
and peace instead of division and war in any event.
One need not know the nature of the great uniters of the
great cultures of our common past.
And more specifically, in light of the sad events
involving the Ethiopian Jews, the discernible and
plainly understandable points of vulnerability sensed
by the Jewish Israelis should perhaps be addressed
by the Muslims and the world, and the Chief Rabbinate in
Israel should consider with tolerance our common sense from our
common God gene, which I think is the same
thing as our curiosity-science gene.
I THINK IT WAS IMPLANTED.
They and their new friends from recent decades,
most leaders of the other faiths, should
consider the historical evidence as a whole in much
the manner as would the student of
the web bot, of digital forensics, etc.
I've personally theorized the existence of a
mathematical construct linking event streams with math--
specifically, that Blaise Pascal added Nostradamus'
insights to Yang Hui's choices-over-time triangle.
I think it's a conveyed lesson. I think the idea we
have to perish is at best half right.
I think we can pass the test and see our
children travel to the stars.
If these guesses hold any validity, then history turns
when scapegoating and arrogance end. Morality may indeed
need explaining in this light by the moral leaders referenced,
and for a long time to come. But the end of divide
and conquer, starting with the
religions and the gays, means the end of parochialism.
The obnoxious person is the loser. LOA. Loser On Arrival.
Just like DOA, Dead On Arrival.
If you are reading this you're likely the rare curious one
actually curious about my curiosity, as this indeed has been
the latest growth point of the theory.
I certainly appreciate your interest, though I'm really
simply pursuing my own curiosity while also objecting
to judging for control.
Prior to a brief trip late June / early July I hope to
do Gladwell / Kenneth Clark and
more on the Nostradamus / Pascal link.
I'm right here connecting my theory with the latest from
Hoagland.
Though he may consider me a kook, and though many of
his colleagues likely regard him as being out in left field,
I consider him a scientist's scientist, and I simply will
pursue my curiosity w/o concern for approval.
I AM SOON INSTALLING A MAJOR RE-WRITE
ON THE HOME PAGE SO AS TO BETTER PRESENT
WHAT'S NOW A MORE SHARPLY DEFINED THEORY,
THOUGH ALSO PRESENTING THE MANY, MANY
ELEMENTS IMPACTING IT, THOUGH I ALSO FIRMLY
THINK THE MANY SUB-THEORIES CAN IN EACH
CASE POTENTIALLY LIVE ON ITS OWN.
HOWEVER, THIS SEEMS TO BE GETTING
MORE SENSE-MAKING ALL THE TIME.
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
The following could belong just as properly on the Science,
Nostradamus or East page.
This theory unites history, science and morality,
and time and location.
Hoagland's study of counter-established pendulum studies
during astronomic Earthly eclipses has to my understanding
led him to theorize validity to the "ether" concept.
He, also to my understanding, theorizes that during these
eclipses gravity behaves differently, so as, to my
understanding, afford a kind of brief anti-gravity value,
knowingly used.
I think that could pertain people living on, say, Mars, or
even, say, on other bodies or stations not actually
involving full travel "between stars."
The "anti-gravity" idea simply cannot, despite its
still science fiction-like feeling, explain travel between
the stars. The distances are still too great.
I independently theorize they allow something else
to behave differently as does gravity, during such
times/places.
I've theorized Nostradamus, unknowingly, must have used
a novel energy, which I theorize is in fact "Ch'i," which also
connects with the "workings" of Western moral ideas as
to information.
Gravity plays a special role in string theory, and I've
made the guess so would this novel energy.
Each is actually "weak" in that they're not "contained"
in our familiar dimension.
I'd like the reader to start thinking in terms of combining
string theory with Garrett Lisi's.
I'm guessing it's the novel energy that enables the
"mother ships" to actually travel between the
stars.
What we can see on Mars, particularly from the
footage at youtube likely inadvertently
left visible by the European Space Agency would indeed
simply be an outpost--a colony.
I'm guessing this novel energy, affording interstellar
travel, is the same means of keeping souls alive.
(MUCH MORE WILL COME HERE)
O.K., this will have to go onto the Science page.
So Hoagland's saying (my understanding) influence along an ether.
He's also saying "torsion" reality.
Think: dreidl.
Torsion is spin physics, highly familiar to anyone
in computer memory.
Hoagland's saying (my understanding) 2 spinning
objects interact with each other, PARTICULARLY
WHEN MAJOR ROTATING BODIES
(AT LEAST AS FAR AS PLANETS ALIGNED
IN ECLIPSE FASHION ARE CONCERNED,)
they affect gravity.
In fact, they interfere with
the apparent accounting of time.
Garrett Lisi has proposed a matrix.
Just prior, string theory has explained much.
Gravity, it's been thought, is comprised of
strings of its own constituency which are
not contained within our familiar dimension,
and, by way of escaping, thes exert weak
influence.
Hoagland's implying that force is altered,
even reversed, when 2 spinning objects
are proximate, at the proper alignment.
This is amply demonstrated with
utterly consistent exactness depending
on each particular of alignment, proximity,
nature of spin, etc., and it's been so
demonstrated in several experiments
in equally convincing, capable labs.
This is astrological indeed.
This would have fascinated my first
serious girlfriend whose astrology
course I audited.
My website invests much as to
Nostradamian proofs and theorizes
unbeknownst to himself he used a
novel energy.
I think that energy behaves like gravity.
Hoagland's discovery pertains anti-gravity, such as
being able to build the Coral Castle in Homestead,
Florida.
But, while anti-gravity can easily enable people in
a colony to travel from Mars to Earth, even THAT
cannot account for travel from, say, Sirius-B's
system.
That's where I'm curious as to a novel energy,
apart from Nostradamus' achievements.
For Hoagland, to quote:
"Like 'stirring cream backwards...
in a solar system 'coffee cup.' ' "
For me:
More Than Gravity Reversing.
A Lesson In Science, History and Morality
Seemingly Timed To Conclude Now.
Why?
It Would Have To Be When The Mothership
Can Come From Much Further Than Mars.
It May Be When Information
Shows Up In Other Stages.
Why Conclude The Lesson Now?
Why Come Now But For That?
I'm Sorry. Be Happy With Hoagland's
Discoveries, As I Am.
My Theory Is:
Conveyed Lesson In Experimental Science,
Event Streams (History,) and Character
of Matter and Information (Morality.)
If At All Valid Questions, Then, Our Morality
Plainly Incorporates Advice and Promises.
Those Promises Are Actually One Promise: Proof Of
Original Information, And We May Be
In A Special Space Wherein Information Can
Show Itself In Different Stages.
However, If We're In A Meta-Experiment Then
Proofs Of Relation Will Include Earth's
Different Locations, And Then, Likely, Proof
Of Our Relation To Our Teachers.
The following could belong just as properly on the Science,
Nostradamus or East page.
This theory unites history, science and morality,
and time and location.
Hoagland's study of counter-established pendulum studies
during astronomic Earthly eclipses has to my understanding
led him to theorize validity to the "ether" concept.
He, also to my understanding, theorizes that during these
eclipses gravity behaves differently, so as, to my
understanding, afford a kind of brief anti-gravity value,
knowingly used.
I think that could pertain people living on, say, Mars, or
even, say, on other bodies or stations not actually
involving full travel "between stars."
The "anti-gravity" idea simply cannot, despite its
still science fiction-like feeling, explain travel between
the stars. The distances are still too great.
I independently theorize they allow something else
to behave differently as does gravity, during such
times/places.
I've theorized Nostradamus, unknowingly, must have used
a novel energy, which I theorize is in fact "Ch'i," which also
connects with the "workings" of Western moral ideas as
to information.
Gravity plays a special role in string theory, and I've
made the guess so would this novel energy.
Each is actually "weak" in that they're not "contained"
in our familiar dimension.
I'd like the reader to start thinking in terms of combining
string theory with Garrett Lisi's.
I'm guessing it's the novel energy that enables the
"mother ships" to actually travel between the
stars.
What we can see on Mars, particularly from the
footage at youtube likely inadvertently
left visible by the European Space Agency would indeed
simply be an outpost--a colony.
I'm guessing this novel energy, affording interstellar
travel, is the same means of keeping souls alive.
(MUCH MORE WILL COME HERE)
O.K., this will have to go onto the Science page.
So Hoagland's saying (my understanding) influence along an ether.
He's also saying "torsion" reality.
Think: dreidl.
Torsion is spin physics, highly familiar to anyone
in computer memory.
Hoagland's saying (my understanding) 2 spinning
objects interact with each other, PARTICULARLY
WHEN MAJOR ROTATING BODIES
(AT LEAST AS FAR AS PLANETS ALIGNED
IN ECLIPSE FASHION ARE CONCERNED,)
they affect gravity.
In fact, they interfere with
the apparent accounting of time.
Garrett Lisi has proposed a matrix.
Just prior, string theory has explained much.
Gravity, it's been thought, is comprised of
strings of its own constituency which are
not contained within our familiar dimension,
and, by way of escaping, thes exert weak
influence.
Hoagland's implying that force is altered,
even reversed, when 2 spinning objects
are proximate, at the proper alignment.
This is amply demonstrated with
utterly consistent exactness depending
on each particular of alignment, proximity,
nature of spin, etc., and it's been so
demonstrated in several experiments
in equally convincing, capable labs.
This is astrological indeed.
This would have fascinated my first
serious girlfriend whose astrology
course I audited.
My website invests much as to
Nostradamian proofs and theorizes
unbeknownst to himself he used a
novel energy.
I think that energy behaves like gravity.
Hoagland's discovery pertains anti-gravity, such as
being able to build the Coral Castle in Homestead,
Florida.
But, while anti-gravity can easily enable people in
a colony to travel from Mars to Earth, even THAT
cannot account for travel from, say, Sirius-B's
system.
That's where I'm curious as to a novel energy,
apart from Nostradamus' achievements.
For Hoagland, to quote:
"Like 'stirring cream backwards...
in a solar system 'coffee cup.' ' "
For me:
More Than Gravity Reversing.
A Lesson In Science, History and Morality
Seemingly Timed To Conclude Now.
Why?
It Would Have To Be When The Mothership
Can Come From Much Further Than Mars.
It May Be When Information
Shows Up In Other Stages.
Why Conclude The Lesson Now?
Why Come Now But For That?
I'm Sorry. Be Happy With Hoagland's
Discoveries, As I Am.
My Theory Is:
Conveyed Lesson In Experimental Science,
Event Streams (History,) and Character
of Matter and Information (Morality.)
If At All Valid Questions, Then, Our Morality
Plainly Incorporates Advice and Promises.
Those Promises Are Actually One Promise: Proof Of
Original Information, And We May Be
In A Special Space Wherein Information Can
Show Itself In Different Stages.
However, If We're In A Meta-Experiment Then
Proofs Of Relation Will Include Earth's
Different Locations, And Then, Likely, Proof
Of Our Relation To Our Teachers.
يرجى النظر في هذه الأفكار.
عائلتي الكبيرة ويشمل اليهود الذين يشعرون خوفك والاستياء.
وهذه النقطة هي أن هذا الفهم هو الهدف من أولئك الذين يسعون إلى السيطرة عليها.
أطلب منكم أن يكون الإخوة مرة أخرى، وكشفت عن الله.
تحتاج إلى إثبات.
يبدو وكأنه جبل.
كنت في حاجة لاثبات عدم مرير.
تثق به.
فتح الى الحب، المساواة والحرية.
يبدو وكأنه جبل.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
ويؤكد محمد اسماعيل.
الحرة. على قدم المساواة. حب.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
يؤكد إسماعيل ومحمد.
الحرة. على قدم المساواة. حب.
لا شيء لإثبات.
استرخاء. أصدقاء.
لا الناس البغيض.
على كل شخص أن يجد له أو عدم الأمان لها.
لسنا خائفين من الناس الذين يشبهون شخص بغيض.
هل تقصد: وماذا اعجاب الله / الله / المسيح؟
مع ماذا اعجاب الله / GD / المسيح؟
الخوف؟ اضطراب؟ الغطرسة؟
لا شيء لإثبات.
لا شيء لإثبات. لا حاجة للانقسام.
أخبر شعبي.
إنقاذ الأرض.
الله. نجوم. حب.
קיים. להיות שווה.
היסטוריה מתחיל שוב כאשר כולם נגמר.
كنت من اخوته غير الاشقاء.
لا غش. ثم لا استياء.
بما فيه الكفاية لعائلتك، والجميع الى جانب أنفسكم.
דיפלומטיה היא למצוא דברים משותפים.
יש לך יותר זה יותר מכל אחד אחר.
Education. Mutual Support.
No division.
Equal. Free. Love.
Free From Deception.
Free From Fear.
Free From Limitation.
Free From Arrogance.
Free From Plutocracy.
Free From The Fear of Vulnerability.
This Is A Rare Seed.
Whatever is Division Is Not
Rational. It's Childish. Then It's Not
Rational.
It Has To Be Someone Needing Division.
There Is No Purpose For Division But
Insecurity or Scapegoating.
Every Human Has More Neural Connections
Than There Are Grains of Sand On a Beach.
Each is a Like a Robot But With More.
عائلتي الكبيرة ويشمل اليهود الذين يشعرون خوفك والاستياء.
وهذه النقطة هي أن هذا الفهم هو الهدف من أولئك الذين يسعون إلى السيطرة عليها.
أطلب منكم أن يكون الإخوة مرة أخرى، وكشفت عن الله.
تحتاج إلى إثبات.
يبدو وكأنه جبل.
كنت في حاجة لاثبات عدم مرير.
تثق به.
فتح الى الحب، المساواة والحرية.
يبدو وكأنه جبل.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
ويؤكد محمد اسماعيل.
الحرة. على قدم المساواة. حب.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
لديك للقيام بذلك.
يؤكد إسماعيل ومحمد.
الحرة. على قدم المساواة. حب.
لا شيء لإثبات.
استرخاء. أصدقاء.
لا الناس البغيض.
على كل شخص أن يجد له أو عدم الأمان لها.
لسنا خائفين من الناس الذين يشبهون شخص بغيض.
هل تقصد: وماذا اعجاب الله / الله / المسيح؟
مع ماذا اعجاب الله / GD / المسيح؟
الخوف؟ اضطراب؟ الغطرسة؟
لا شيء لإثبات.
لا شيء لإثبات. لا حاجة للانقسام.
أخبر شعبي.
إنقاذ الأرض.
الله. نجوم. حب.
קיים. להיות שווה.
היסטוריה מתחיל שוב כאשר כולם נגמר.
كنت من اخوته غير الاشقاء.
لا غش. ثم لا استياء.
بما فيه الكفاية لعائلتك، والجميع الى جانب أنفسكم.
דיפלומטיה היא למצוא דברים משותפים.
יש לך יותר זה יותר מכל אחד אחר.
Education. Mutual Support.
No division.
Equal. Free. Love.
Free From Deception.
Free From Fear.
Free From Limitation.
Free From Arrogance.
Free From Plutocracy.
Free From The Fear of Vulnerability.
This Is A Rare Seed.
Whatever is Division Is Not
Rational. It's Childish. Then It's Not
Rational.
It Has To Be Someone Needing Division.
There Is No Purpose For Division But
Insecurity or Scapegoating.
Every Human Has More Neural Connections
Than There Are Grains of Sand On a Beach.
Each is a Like a Robot But With More.
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
This being the social page I'll rattle off above self-limiting
arbitrary perversions visibly reflected
by gay-gene correlations. The would-be macho guy is the
likelier gay gene carrier, at least
in those communities demonizing so transference can reign.
Baldness. Voluntary Obesity.
Inability To Talk To Men. Consummate Self-Absorption.
Neuroplastic Paranoia. The Need To Control For Self-
Validation And As Community Standard Of Conflating
Good Morality With Anti-Social Behavior
For me the King of the Hill here would be
not one of the would-be killers of a tourist
who was not gay but was mistaken for that
by people running to fascist-associated
country. And to date most/all of that sort
has proven being gay, the ultimate gradient
of proof.
(Actually, the likeliest associable, I believe,
were reportedly gay, but that is clouded--
DISCLAIMER: I DO NOT KNOW THE NATURE
OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONE IN ANY MANNER
BY THIS IDENTIFIABLE OR OF THAT OF
ANY OF THEIR RELATIONS)
I'd say it was Jared Loughner, whose nature
are really don't know but which looks
quite possibly consistent with the above
by this; and, frankly, he actually does match
a common macho image assumed by communities
liking to judge and limit.
And him?
Arrested Growth: Demonization and the need to assert
gender in adulthood, and taught to
youngsters, and bullying and school shootings.
Endless thoughtless toward girls. Lack of appreciation
of women besides the young Barbie doll--living clone.
This is ego defense. That's lack of recognition.
That's also probably reflective of
a mother who could have done more being a fun mother.
It's a father with similar failings.
Nothings all or nothing. However, there's enough involved
that it's fly to the stars or perish time, I'm thinking.
Cheating to assert gender.
I once placed (censored / placed
elsewhere anyway) arrested growth
taught, and more particularly the "you can't talk to
other guys and be a guy" perversion easily can
account for some degree of autistic influence.
That's likely a syndrome with multiple inputs.
One can have this family.
Or one can have this girl.
(You only need / want to 1:45.)
I really don't know, of course.
She was in fact examined as to all
relevant anatomy and neurologically
as well.
There is no known precedent, no
plain explanation, though she of
course could simply be history's
most talented girl.
It's the license to judge to control.
fellow worker.
Boss.
Family member.
Pop faux psych star.
The list is likely infinite.
I think that's got most of what people who've followed
me from the predecessor site wanted.
I'll be adding to everything, but the topics below
are linchpin.
CONFLATING GOOD MORALITY WITH ANTI-SOCIAL
BEHAVIOR AND SELF-LIMITATION
This is all the above.
If you can tell me what a rich despotism-loving
person, or someone who can self-validate or
self-adulate by excelling in the many
ways aligned monopoly can afford,
could want more, you'll please
let me know.
We know from the likes of Jack
Ruby who's made most public.
Associate with the demonized (you gotta'
demonize first of course) and rape the land,
colonize the risk arrangements, deceive your
followers as to the future (pertains
economics, Shakespeare too--coming.)
The only successful controller of whatever
can happen is the one who successfully
controls.
This is indeed the Government of Transference,
the Government of Scapegoating,
the Sad Environment to which the talented
good person has had to adapt and with which
the arrogant person has rather enjoyed
adapting.
familiar?
are we all on board the general idea?
I actually think that's it.
I think emergence is very practical.
I've indicated elsewhere humans may have
the good luck of relation and what it takes
to embark an a "next step" of understanding
science, morality and history, even though,
such organisms as whales actually have
MORE spindle cells, and likely other
anatomy making them MORE
compassionate.
I search myself using this
website's URL and holygenes primarily.
It's based on people's knowledge of this ahead of myself.
They're masters, they're the deceivers referenced, they're
the deceivers foreseen. There are no gays to hunt down
but the hypocrites, who are the foreseen. The only ones that
matter in terms of being "bad" are not the ones produced by
this product who simply enjoy its benefits, where it might happen
they do. It's really just the players exerting the obnoxiousness.
There's none of us not guilty of judging or arrogance
or compensating. I don't see how we get through
this absent forgiveness.
MARS
NOSTRADAMUS
This has been the most important
part of this. Personalities seen
point to point in real time.
Now, as I'm drawing in this, add to the
Renaissance Genius Train Galileo.
So, we have Nostradamus to Pascal, taking
up Yang Hui's triangle-formulating stacking of
choices, to Galileo, to Newton.
Besides being our father of mathematics,
author of "...Principia...," and inventor of
calculus, he of course is probably history's
greatest (currently worthless to most reading this)
astrologer. He also intensely studied the
closest thing available to the blueprints to
the Temple of Solomon.
Torsion physics wins out, it's intensely related
to the orientation of planets, astrology is
totally in.
It immediately draws parallels to the famous
systems of earlier civilization.
The energy transfer rates involved vastly outstrip
the speed of light-- (developing the connections.)
They are apart from gravity, though gravity may
be reversed.
I am presenting evidence as to Nostradamus'
achievements being authentic, and I don't think
he had a worm hole hidden in his closet.
I don't think he only worked during planar
eclipses.
I think another energy is involved.
If it sees personalities point to point,
this would be the energy you really want.
Our friends on Mars seem to have been saying
they think this energy pertains everything
you are beyond being a robot.
I'm also guessing it pertains travel
between the stars.
Hoagland a while back seemed to reference
the possibility of an actual informational
tranformation involving a famous person
of our own present.
I today think this may be possible.
Basis my own theory, I'm guessing we're
concluding a potentially limited, potentially
limitless, history, but not by coincidence of
choice.
I think this looks interesting.
I think, in view of the above, it's
simply a colony.
The real fun starts after 5:00.
Prior to the tsunami, Japan planned
a moon base. It's a foregone conclusion,
if that should be cancelled, they would've
found these people's stuff.
If it's not a hoax on YouTube where a purported
CIA agent says aliens, or some aliens, exist
in a transient state, he may see that as
proof there's no God but it's actually proof
there is. This would simply reflect the
different stages of information that can
actually be mastered to a point.
I happen to consider that I was not
one extracting from others for my own
purposes when I had no sense of formal
moral tradition.
There are surely those who think that
the existence of aliens means, for them,
should they be pre-disposed by the need
to engage in transference, division, control
and deceit, that there is nothing whatsoever
to gain or lose by caring or not about morality.
It's my theory these aliens who are
waiting for us to understand and conclude
this lesson in science, morality and history
DO believe information
is transformational, and I think their
understanding of it enables travel
between the stars.
Those who've chosen evil compulsively
and now do so because they like their mistaken
belief it doesn't exist may quite conceivably
have it forever.
As corny as it sounds, I think these face monuments
are aimed at serving as welcoming signs just as one
would see sequential billboards on pre-interstate
highways.
They may also be intended to serve as assurances of
similarity, relation, trustworthyness.
There must be a connection between
our being in this place in time and
space and why it is these people's
friends are (I'm guessing) coming
from another star system (for traveling
to which even anti-gravity technology
would not suffice, the distances being
so great.)
There will be much more.
SHAKESPEARE
I promised connecting
Malcolm Gladstone / Dr. Kenneth Clark (Brown v. Board of Education,)
that being supportive of my points, which so far I've done on the
HOME page,including with explaining in connection with
"Ruined" and "The Help."
More fundamentally, seeing personalities through
time-space in real-time, no "time-delay" due to
light-years of distance, is Nostradamus.
Then, Shakespeare.
Shakespeare is responsibility / chance (or "fate.")
I'm not a fate guy, but I DO think deception as to
chance matters, along with people being
ripped off as to finagling on risk.
The Nostradamus Code, which, with the above,
I'll better address after a brief, immediate
intermission, pertains
1st: substitituting letters basis
Nostradamus-Time French and Our-Time French,
OBVIOUSLY INTENDED AS A PROOF
IN ITSELF THAT HE COULD SEE
ACTUAL EVENTS IN OUR TIME.
The resulting reconstructions read like
ultra-currently-familiar self proofs, really
no interpretation aspect involved at all.
Those substitutions render numerical
values, which, when compared with
other numerical values horizontally,
the Past / Our-Time French being
stacked vertically, render an utterly
exact duplicate of how Pascal's Triangle
works.
I think it's a fair guess Shakespeare utilized
some encoding along this line.
My present manner of travel, because of a traumatic
experience during my college years, induces me
to "load up" (just some) to cope.
Understand, others who've had that experience
often wouldn't even bother trying.
As I did earlier with someone's instruction, I'll
be using the state, and sense of stress, so
as to write whatever seemingly meaningful
should come to me, on the back of one of
my father's pictures.
See the HOME page, toward the bottom,
so as to understand what that's about.
This little piece here will be deleted.
There is one item I won't have time to
plug in properly till I return.
It's petty compared to the rest, on the one hand,
but it's important-practical in terms of proving
relevance of this theory.
Explaining you "OMG" being stolen.
I explain here:
Rigged economics is risk apportioned unfairly.
One can be aware of known risks.
They can be apportioned unfairly where one
has monopoly power and can pay off
the rule creators.
The people doing that can understand you
are essentially living as though you were
living in an episode of "The Twilight Zone,"
with seemingly unforeseeable stuff actually
here and there likely to happen but those
understanding control not wanting you to
know that, which is
easily accomplished if you are self-limited and
sent off judging others.
So they want you to ignore that.
Adam Smith actually ADVOCATED safety nets.
Some societies try guarding against
monopoly and unfair treatment of risk.
You can be convinced you don't need
to worry about risk, but in any
field where someone is telling you to
be that way, guess what, you jerk,
they're doin' it cause you do.
That's you cutting off you nose despite
your face.
Particular academicians will understand that,
though as of now I don't know if I'll
pursue it.
However, if it's here, chances are good I will.
I'm back from travel.
My mother-in-law said she forgot
too much Shakespeare.
I will connect Shakespeare's relevance and
then actually search likely prospects for
the presence of coding.
I've indicated elsewhere.
I'm a lawyer.
I'm multi-professional because
I'm also economics.
I'll be addressing risk gamed and
chance gamed, with each taking advantage
of people's frankly being aware of neither.
The people engaging in this deception come from:
transference, pacification, arrogance.
The first two follow a simple game-plan.
The latter would not be arrogant unless they
suffered from a need for their
self-proving combined with their actually
being talented.
They will game known / less-obvious--
risk.
That is so simply gaming, in the vernacular
of economists, narrow and fat tails.
To the historians: periodization.
They don't lack for the math, though, when
they DO engage the math, for them, unlike
the economists, who don't depart from the
familiar., they have to resort to such things as
the web bot and the iChing.
These frauds of transference, pacification and
ego defense can claim their risk-free space
and then sell whatever makes it work.
Then, for the sake of making it work, they can
quote the ancients.
But risk should be fairly treated.
Gatekeeping employees costing
$100 B's justifying $100'sMM for
monopoly heads, with sub-system efficiencies
sold, after the fact of 100,000's of families
destroyed by known risk / less known risk,
but inevitable need passed off onto destroyed
families, defines a health care as much as does
$3 Trillion in free reserves in banking.
Capitalism will begin when those
profiting from transference and when those
needing to profit from their lack of recognition
give way to free-equal-love.
7/8/2012
I'm back.
I still care to advance this
theory in science, morality and history.
I will endeavor to tie all threads summarily.
I'll be placing outreach at professional sites
in bit and pieces, testing those who
assume whatever hasn't already been
in their heads can't be true.
For this area, I'll invent a hypothetical
family of billionaire demagogues.
Their self-serving purposes will be based
on a false premise.
Their gaming of morality, science and history
runs the gamut of all history; but, as I've
said, no human is to blame.
Whomever is next to be scapegoated,
I'll, as did the Danes for the Jews, adorn
the appearance of the scapegoated.
Hypothetical families could still travel
on yachts and hire lawyers to spitefully
sue me, so I'm prepping my ability to simply
"demur."
This area will connect with Shakespeare in
terms of, as you might have guessed,
"manifest destiny."
This will bear directly with my already-stated
interest in re-uniting half-brothers.
It will pertain everyone else directly, as the underlying
issues pertain everyone else. So this pertains
not being colonized by one's neighbor as much as
it pertains Hawaiians not wanting to be colonized by
mainlanders, or immigrants having trouble getting
over their transference and feelings of resentment.
Economics is truth as much as is
any math system, be it biologic
or anything else.
That pertains biologic systems,
or any system with every element offsetting
every other, even if indirectly.
That defines potentially
a larger manner of truth.
The economics of no
free lunch is the
psychology of no
free lunch.
Free Equal Love
I Come From What Is Possibly,
And Now Probably, History's
Most Mixed Families.
I Care To Prove Relation
And Original Information.
I Am, My Website Is,
Believing Free Equal Love
Are Approximations At To:
Specific Aspects Of
Information's Ability To
Live.
I Will Present Myself As
Whomever Would Be Controlled
For The Purpose Of
Fear Used For Gain,
Mollification Applied For
Personal Need To Compensate,
Ego Defense For Lack Of
RIghtful Parental Love.
Those Are Ideas For My Readers'
Tolerant Consideration, But, This
Website Proposes Itself Being
History's Greatest Missionary.
Each Belief System Is Already
Free Equal Love.
It's math / event streams / morality.
I'm obviously not escaping the morality.
I Think, To Simplify:
Free Equal Love
just approximations...
then each location
growth to potential,
and then, no soul
wanting.
URL FOR THIS LOCATION
7/20/2012
Sorry for the long absence.
Here's the deal.
I don't know if Shakespeare's
struggle, fate vs. responsibility is
correctly understood already.
However, his work immediately
followed Nostradamus'.
Many others are agreed as to Nostradamus
having foreseen a choice to be made
by ourselves, now.
Dating would be accurate, if the interpretation
is correct, because apart from
the orientation of the planets having
gravitational and time-related effects
as described by Hoagland, their
orientations in the astrologic sense are
entirely valid crude dating mechanisms.
I will not decipher anything "interpretive"
from Nostradamus, but I WILL link
references. I consider the 3 quatrains
on the Nostradamus page on this website
to lavishly contain many layers of
self-validation.
Nostradamus appears to have made it plain
he didn't want his full prophesies to be
so much as understandable, until now.
Some of the world's greatest physicists consider
being possible such things as expansive 2-dimensional
existences on the outside of a black hole, complete
with the fullest of our experience.
I don't think we need to know.
However, I think we are computers in a computer-like
information-bound universe, some aspects of
that information more or less bound up
in an unbending structure, others more fluid.
Our story was "foreseen" by Nostradamus.
If anyone changed it along the way, we would
not be here.
I think he felt the human path would've ended for
good if it were altered prior to reaching a
particular point, which point, interpretively,
is now.
That implies we can survive from having gained
something from the time.
I think it's the lesson in science, math, morality.
I'll be lacing back the wording all over the website
and better detailing the Duel Quatrain (Nostradamus)
respecting its similarity to Pascal's Triangle.
But, I kinda' like my theory as to the moralilty,
how it applies to history and science, and
now particularly how it applies to our world events
currently.
The East page, which already has some references
and open appeals as to the combatants in
Israel / Palestine, will figure directly now from this.
This will be an statement of my application
of this theory to how I see the parties' attitudes
alternating with pictures.
The pictures will reflect judgement for control,
demonization, false blame.
This will generally not pertain
Muslims but for that core
convinced Israel caused their
imprisonment and poverty.
Our whole world suffers
from control.
Our only hope to travel to
the stars, as I see it, is for
the Jewish and Muslim
religious leadership to
choose their own professed
moralities over selfishness
and blame.
Literally half-brothers
yet to grow up.
That core is guilty of murdering
Margaret Hassan and lancing
pregnant women in their wombs
in Kuwait City.
This is how I actually do know I'm
on the right track.
That and the honor killings.
Imagine killing your wife or
daughter out of self-adulation.
Mohammed was educated
by a woman, who became his wife.
I'll be adding some science.
I'll be discussing ego defense.
I'll be discussing seeming favoritism.
I'll be discussing feelings of lack of recognition
VIS-A-VIS the half-brother wrongly blamed
but nonetheless a dash arrogant, that arrogance
caused by the same error that causes the
scapegoating, but where that error has not
been so disastrous.
I will then ask the Muslims to end the
honor killing, join with their half-brother,
end the regimes of deception, end the
scapegoating that would lay blame to
Anne Frank for the selfishness and
arrogance of our world.
I propose our conveyors told of a story
first in astologic terms. Each
phase has a character depiction. With
their theorized guidance, those aspects of
information are thus informed to us
possibly enjoying a manner of life.
One ultra qualified physicist has already
theorized "transformed" information is
perhaps present. It's been rumored beings
exist in a state not familiar to us.
Even if one imagines teleportation, even
one imagines teleportation of synapses
fully intact, can you teleport a personality?
Maybe there's an ultra simple trick to
disappearing, if one simply knows
how to manipulate the energy involved.
What I do know is our planet does not stand
a chance if, as has often been the case at
home, considering what was supposed to be a
right measure for education, or health, or
the environment, but was not, the effort to
bring democracy to the Middle East, when we
are governed by oligopolists at home, only
brings, for lack of a plea to not scapegoat for
the frauds of the Presidents of the Middle
East, an aggression that can only be met
be a response which, when combined with
our planet's fast degradation, would spell
our end.
The Muslims have to understand transference,
mollication, not arrogance alone.
It is insulting when the arrogant person sees
someone on the sidewalk and rolls up the window.
It's insulting when someone stares at someone else
as though the non-paranoid at the receiving end
has something wrong with him/her self, when, of course,
the judger is the paranoid, and an annoying one.
To have been denied recognition, then to face
arrogance from one perceived to be favored
by the parent, is an emotional weight.
I only know psychiatry a little less thinly than
I do Shakespeare. But the issue of the half-
brother is what I have to stand on for
2 reasons:
1: It fits not too shabbily.
2: If my theory's specifics are to matter,
then our time and place and the subject time
and place, and the obvious clue as to
Ishmael and Isaac, with the specific language
as to half-brothers expressed, have to matter.
If parents weren't affected by transference, mollification
and ego defense, then none of this would be
happening.
In the words of Sly, everybody would be a star.
The pictures will have to come.
They're mostly already here, but they have to
be staged again.
It has to be considered the U.S. is rightly
scared of nukes in the wrong hands, as
undoubtedly are the leaders in Europe's
capitals.
The good people of the world don't deserve any
of the selflish controls and oligopolies.
It is the Muslim religious leadership, together
with the Christian and Jewish religious leadership,
which have to attend to those who would
destroy Israel.
I think the Christians are ready.
I don't know about the Jewish Orthodox leadership,
nor about the Muslim.
The Beijing leadership is a copy of a mistaken
reaction to monopoly.
The East and West are identical but for
an accident of judging to control and demonize.
The East has territorial disputes, but it's not the
site of hangings for reasons of birth.
The North Koreans are suddenly acting a little
in the manner of Deng.
Rather than caring about peace the West is
caring about what trademarks they use.
The North is doing it cause they know
the Korean peoples can easily stand
on either side of the DMZ and demand
reunification and democracy.
Then, Beijing would be next.
All systems of control should end.
I believe in free-equal-love.
The Muslims cannot in turn blame
Anne Frank for the world's control freaks
and arrogant people, for in doing so they
are being control freaks and self-adulating.
Anne Frank committed no crime.
Her killers were murderers.
I like music. All kinds.
I happen to like Wagner some, nothing
special in comparison to so many other
great composers.
Leonard Bernstein famously conducted
Wagner in Germany.
Music is beautiful without the politics.
But it was Hitler's obsession.
Richard Strauss disdained Naziism as
a statement of national mediocrity.
But, for a fact I've known plenty self-
righteous, arrogant, but not knowingly
hurtful, ego-challenged people,
in positions unfairly advantageous to them,
essentially enslaving of others, who also
listened to Wagner, not for the beauty,
but for the hole in their emotions.
I've suggested seeing
our seeming divisions working like
Legoland pieces.
Now imagine our ideas of living
information simply blending together
slightly differently from what we've
imagined.
Then consider the Muslim is a Jew and a Christian.
Then consider the Jew is a Christian and a Muslim.
Then consider the Christian is a Jew and a Muslim.
That's because the three constitute free-equal-love.
For tonight, I leave you
with Richard Strauss.
And now, Wagner, but only for
the beauty, conducted by Bernstein.
And now, Wagner, in Israel.
Next:
Islamic and Jewish music on
the Temple on the Mount
at the request of the moral
leaders of both.
Otherwise, what is their morality?
Now, imagine the great Eastern religions
(I've addressed Confucianism in various
locations, Buddhism directly in multiple
locations, and am planning to do more
with Hinduism. You will find, though,
most / virtually all human esoterica that
arrives at human relations arrive at
free equal love / respect for the life around us.)
are identical but for the one gradient.
The gradient, that blushy gradient has to remain.
That's because the Iranian Government hangs
gay people in public squares to this day.
That's not simply to judge / control / demonize /
make people fear association with the demonized /
shift blame, etc.
It's for sheer scapegoating for its own right.
It's sheer "SS" executions.
It's the holocaust.
It's one license for holocausts.
It's the murder of despair as well the
inadequacies described most elsewhere
in this website.
When you want the free equal love found in all Earth's curiosity,
but without the judging, controlling, monopoly (that's not just
cross-border control--it's class control,) you are Ghandi.
Jews and Muslims profess the morality of love.
Every major moral leader preaches the morality of love
--WHEN CHALLENGED FOR ITS EXISTENCE.
You rarely if ever hear it from the particularly
angry mullahs in the Middle East.
It is not my desire to insult Islam.
I am asking the angry mullahs to not be
preachers of transference, false blame,
murder as an answer to hurt feelings
no matter how severe.
The reason is a certain measure of
fault on the Israelis' part is faced off
with what was originally only
unjustified anger but now is indeed
insult.
There's no way out.
You can only destroy each other.
And our world.
I'm going to return to this,
for what it may be worth to
the reader. This is a complicated
accident of history. In part, the
Palestinians justifiably feel ripped off.
And by an arrogant taker.
And a modest strain of selfishness,
witnessable in any threatened
people eager to assert its birthright,
comes with that taking.
How insulting and frustrating.
Yet it comes after an original, and
then repeated attemp(s) of
annihilation.
If you can be tolerant of
the idea of being unified by
"free-equal-love" just long
enough to act like brothers
understanding an worthwhile goal,
then, this particular theory says
the only path to life is to indicate
an understanding of history and
the desire to be brothers again.
As at the very least understood esoterically as
presented to us as part of our known history,
Mohammed traded with Jews and Christians.
His trading skills were substantially
enhanced by Kadija.
He preached equality.
He's equally part of three things that
have repeatedly resonated through
history:
free-equal-love.
Your religion says it's based
on Judaism and Christianity.
I think there's much those in the
West can be interested in.
Evidence of a special involvement
of the Kabah is well known among
many in the West.
That draws curiosity as does Hiawatha
to persons who have corresponded
with me since early in life of this
website and its predecessor's.
You cannot harm one any more
than one can shoot his own
foot and not feel it.
This is so very much like talking to
two young half-brothers.
The Jews, as much as I'm unimpressed
with certain aspects of how they
conduct their civil affairs, and though admittedly
independence came with the use of force, had
until the birth of Israel, and thereafter, only
acquired land legally.
No other nation was interested in creating
the state of Palestine.
No other nation would have created
the state of Palestine.
It is not because of the Jews that
Palestine does not exist.
However, it is because of the
Jews that Palestine can exist.
They sought friendship.
They were welcomed with attempted
annihilation. That was partly
induced by the Jerusalem mufti's
history of association with the forces
of rage.
but, when challenged, all preachers of all
the major religions claim the morality of love is theirs.
In saying that, they're of course correct.
Islam has a wealth of love poems.
Personally living in Los Angeles, I can
readily assure that many of the most
insightfully moral, love-bound stories that
have appeared in movie theatres , on
TV, and in our music have been
Jewish.
The world requires proof of that morality
for us to survive, I believe.
It is simply my guess, if they can do that,
we will then have an opportunity to know
it can actually live.
I'm also guessing we'll feel being awash in it.
To not do so is to choose the opposite.
I'm going to lay out some architecture as my own
best task manager, including, once again, for the
reason simply being job / family.
Galileo / Nostradamus / Newton / Shakespeare / Blaise Pascal
Neils Bohr..............Albert Einstein
Galileo’s having been called a non-moralist
is like a person not liking monopolies being
called a socialist by the monopolist.
Galileo was a moralist, and he is today universally
accepted as having been personally curious in both
the seeming mystical and the
more familiar scientific.
A famous, courageous, scientist's
scientist of our own time.
דוקטור
This Is Self-Absorption
את פסק הדין
This Is Self-Absorption And Control
"It so happens that killing a man is not the greatest evil
that one can do that man. The Nazis were specialists,
not only in murder and physical torture,
but also in man's degradation and debasement,
in the extermination of his hope,
his attachment to life and his faculty of reasoning."
Julius Fucik was saying it does not require
ovens or killings at all to conduct a holocaust.
The transferers of fear, the munchkins, live out their lives
utterly wasted--obnoxious, limited, self-worthless, anti-
social. Theft of all that's good in the soul. They're
destroyed too.
I believe L. Frank Baum's "Oz" was primarily inspired,
and likely substantially informed as to its ideas
by Matilda Joslyn Gage.
What would she have meant by the idea
just click your heels three times?
I think it's a combination of believing
in yourself, being yourself, not fearing evil,
choosing free equal love.
That brings the courage, smarts and heart.
Although China has this:
it does not actually exist CULTURALLY
as a land of control freaks.
But they're the exact same morality
but for that.
Buddhism and Hinduism
are the same but without
the pretense for control.
Without the mistaken reaction
to monopoly.
Buddhism is the attainment of a
personal transformation by tuning out
the transference, mollification and ego
defense.
Buddha established a following.
He was not the hermit living
outside ancient Jerusalem.
Hinduism is all that but with knowledge
from the Vedics. They understand our
mystical curiosities connect with earlier
interactions.
There is a natural competition for women
by men. It's perverted by transference,
mollification and ego defense.
Self-absorption. Blame.
If Freud was primarily a story of the Oedipal
Complex and an innate conflict of morality,
ego and super-ego, then, is he really simply the
personal story of recognition longed
for from a mother but denied?
But, imagine if, though not the case
with Freud, who apparently would’ve been
happy to jump into bed with his mother,
the mother was abusive.
There is believed to exist texts rejected
from inclusion from the existing Bibles of
our religions that can be interpreted to
serve selfish aims, including as to this.
They are not part of Eastern morality,
which is the same as Western, I believe,
except for the decision to demonize
a group by its fact of birth.
I believe the East is morally identical
even though Easterners seemingly not of the
Abrahamic religions do not engage in
dividing to demonize, or demonizing to
divide.
There has never been hanging of gays
in the East.
There certainly IS territorial tribalilsm.
Modern Mongols very infamously cite
their desire for purity and even openly
speak not apologetically with the resonance
of that with Nazism.
But they don't demonize so leaders can
deceive and limit their own people, or so
they can rumble with falsely demonized
neighbors, or so they might engage in
such things as the monopolist calling
the antagonist a socialist.
as a land of control freaks.
But they're the exact same morality
but for that.
Buddhism and Hinduism
are the same but without
the pretense for control.
Without the mistaken reaction
to monopoly.
Buddhism is the attainment of a
personal transformation by tuning out
the transference, mollification and ego
defense.
Buddha established a following.
He was not the hermit living
outside ancient Jerusalem.
Hinduism is all that but with knowledge
from the Vedics. They understand our
mystical curiosities connect with earlier
interactions.
There is a natural competition for women
by men. It's perverted by transference,
mollification and ego defense.
Self-absorption. Blame.
If Freud was primarily a story of the Oedipal
Complex and an innate conflict of morality,
ego and super-ego, then, is he really simply the
personal story of recognition longed
for from a mother but denied?
But, imagine if, though not the case
with Freud, who apparently would’ve been
happy to jump into bed with his mother,
the mother was abusive.
There is believed to exist texts rejected
from inclusion from the existing Bibles of
our religions that can be interpreted to
serve selfish aims, including as to this.
They are not part of Eastern morality,
which is the same as Western, I believe,
except for the decision to demonize
a group by its fact of birth.
I believe the East is morally identical
even though Easterners seemingly not of the
Abrahamic religions do not engage in
dividing to demonize, or demonizing to
divide.
There has never been hanging of gays
in the East.
There certainly IS territorial tribalilsm.
Modern Mongols very infamously cite
their desire for purity and even openly
speak not apologetically with the resonance
of that with Nazism.
But they don't demonize so leaders can
deceive and limit their own people, or so
they can rumble with falsely demonized
neighbors, or so they might engage in
such things as the monopolist calling
the antagonist a socialist.